Is there a case to be made for JMM having attained ATG status??

NO... he is no where near Pac's resume, legacy.. etc etc.

 

you are really retared Pac is not the only ATG in history deal with it

 

JMM is no where near Pac's greatness/legacy

beating someone "H2H" does not prove one is a greater fighter, JMM ****

Sandy Sadler might of had Pep's number, and one more "head to head" fights

Pep is still the greater fighter, with the greater legacy

 

doesn't change the fact that Saddler is top 50 ATG in almost every list issued by a journal or specialist

 

Yeah, JMM is an ATG in my view. He had always lacked that huge victory before. The one that stood out among the others, and although he wasn't given the decision, I'm adament that he won the fight on Saturday. He deserves at least one victory over Manny Pacquiao. Coupled with his resume, in ring abilities, and longevity, JMM is clearly one of the special ones.

 

he is no where near pac's legacy

 

Agreed, but he is a special fighter in his own right.

 

besides pacquiao who has he fougt though

JMM resume is pretty crappy to be honest, it should be better then it is

 

no..... im just saying, that JMM might be better H2H then Pac

Pac still has a greater legacy

 

JMM has fought relatively no one good, besides Pac...

pac gets criticized for fighting old shane, but JMM fights who.. oh yeah Likar Ramos