Which trilogy was better?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by vipers, Nov 14, 2011.

  1. vipers

    vipers Guest

    Riddick Bowe vs Evander Holyfield or Floyd Patterson vs Ingemar Johansson?

    Imo Riddick Bowe vs Evander Holyfield trilogy is better but there both great i will probz watch the Patterson vs Johansson trilogy again soon.
     
  2. Goyourownway

    Goyourownway Insanity enthusiast Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2011
    Messages:
    2,667
    Likes Received:
    21
    Who considers the Patterson-Johansson to be great? First fight was a blowout,second fight was a nothing one before the knockout,and beside the opening round,the third fight wasn't much either.


    The Bowe-Holyfield trilogy is quite possibly the greatest heavyweight trilogy ever.
     
  3. TIGEREDGE

    TIGEREDGE Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2007
    Messages:
    6,620
    Likes Received:
    31
    agreed those fights were arguably better than frazier v ali
     
  4. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2004
    Messages:
    38,042
    Likes Received:
    7,552
    Patterson-Johansson and Zale-Graziano are my favorite trilogies.
     
  5. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2009
    Messages:
    55,982
    Likes Received:
    10,399
    I'm a massive Patterson fan, and he's one of my top ten favourites to watch, but it's got to be Holy/Bowe. Much richer, more competitive work and more of it being done throughout those. Patterson/Ingo was a great one, though.
     
  6. Steenalized

    Steenalized Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2010
    Messages:
    9,337
    Likes Received:
    1
    Bowe-Holyfield. Awesome fights all around. Patterson-Johansson is excellent too though, it's more of a 1 and 1a thing.
     
  7. MagnaNasakki

    MagnaNasakki Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2006
    Messages:
    7,658
    Likes Received:
    78
    I don't find Patterson-Johanssen awesome. Each fight was kind of one sided. The 2nd one had a great knockout, though.

    The first and second Holyfield-Bowe fights were hyper competitive barn burners. Classic rounds, classic action, give and take, chances in momentum, multiple storylines.

    Holy-Bowe III was kinda sad, but even then, it wasn't a terribly poor fight and had some good dramatic moments.

    Patterson-Johanssen is an important trilogy, but its not one of the best heavyweight series. I'd rate Bowe-Holy over it easily.
     
  8. TAC602

    TAC602 Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2011
    Messages:
    1,672
    Likes Received:
    6
    Hell yeah.

    Only shame is that Tyson wasn't around in 1992-94 to mix it up with those guys. Throw Lewis, Foreman, Moorer in there as well. It was already a tremendous division in the first half of the decade with Tyson behind bars.
     
  9. DonBoxer

    DonBoxer The Lion! Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2010
    Messages:
    8,063
    Likes Received:
    34
    Non are a patch the the Oceans movies.
     
  10. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2008
    Messages:
    25,419
    Likes Received:
    9,385
    Not even close.
     
  11. RockyJim

    RockyJim Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2005
    Messages:
    5,235
    Likes Received:
    2,430
    I agree with Red Cobra...