Most people who thought JMM won, didnt score it Round by Round

I've browsed through several articles from press row scoring that state they could find no one from press row that scored the fight for Pacquiao.

......that best Pacquiao could do at press row from anyone was a draw.......and according to the articles, there were many at press row that had Marquez winning by a wide margin.


If the thread starting troll needs to be reminded, press row scores round by round, and they have the benefit of not having to listen to any broadcast teams bias.:deal

 

Reply to my PM, bro. I'm reaching out to you. :yep

 

That is very telling. Good observation.

 

Huge Johnny Tapia fan...
:hey

 

Have a look again at round 1, 6 and 11 with the sound off

 

I wrote the same thing in another thread. Hard fight to score, with fast fighters and many close rounds. I wont get hysterical about people scoring the fight for JMM, but if Pacs aggression was ineffective why was both Marquez eyes swelling like that? Frankly, he looked like a guy who had taken a beating. :think

 

This is something I have asked to a few posters. Nothing back. If Pac was made to look silly or amateurish, why did Pac outland him pretty much every round, and make JMM look the worse for wear between the two? :huh

 

Jesus Christ Lance, I know you're a Pac fan, but I'd figure you were one that at least would admit when he was wrong when it was clear as day you were.

Here's a response I had to some of the closer rounds issue I posted in a different thread........

......and as for Marquez bruising up during the fight.
Please Lance dont embarrass yourself. You know very well that certain skin types bruise much more easily.

Name me some fights from Marquez' recent past, from the Pacquiao 2nd fight ti'll present that Marquez fought rounds and did'nt bruise up.
Marquez bruises up even in fights he completely dominates, you know that Lance.:think

 

I suspect that some posters put to much faith in their ability to understand what goes on inside the ring. If both boxers are fast, it is very hard to tell when they land clean or not. Perhaps Marquez is seen as the winner not because he landed the better shots but the slower ones?

To make a comparasion: after the fight between Wlad and Haye, Hayes own trainer stated that he not realized how badly Haye was tagged until he watched the slow mo replay. Now, thats a trained observer in the corner of a HW fight (albeit between to silly fast HW's). Yet people watching the fight between Pac and JMM over Youtube are dead sure about who won the fight

 

I watched the fight on a 62 inch HD screen and it could'nt be any clearer Marquez was the clear outright winner.

You have no basis to claim Pacquiao won.

Internet polls everywhere say the people who watched at home had Marquez winning by over 2 to 1 margins.

.......and for those who were actually there at the fight, the margin is quite much larger.:deal

 

I've seen people who scored the fight for JMM give Pac rounds 1, 2, 3, 6, 8,9, 10, 11, or 12. Odd isn't it?