Most of ESBer's don't know how to score a fight!!!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Pink Floyd, Nov 14, 2011.


  1. purephase

    purephase Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,740
    89
    Jan 14, 2011
    Oh **** you just cut me to my soul at the end there :crying. Multiple people have found it inaccurate in real-time, in slow-motion, whenever. I also don't care that the system requires more than one person to score a punch; that doesn't somehow make them objective or legitimate, and it doesn't mean anyone should be looking at them when determining whether a fight was or was not scored properly.
     
  2. pejevan

    pejevan inmate No. 1363917 Full Member

    18,163
    2
    May 24, 2006

    Its inaccuracy stems from it being scored in real time- and in case you don't know what that means, while the fight is happening.

    Unlike you, they actually tried to score it as objectively as possible. Unless it is done using slow-motion technology, you can never get 100 per cent accuracy.

    But it is probably the only number you can get because I still have to see a number coming form your worthless opinions.
     
  3. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,449
    51
    Dec 5, 2006
    CompuBox and PunchStat are great for making predictions and for conversation but YOU CAN'T USE THEM TO SCORE A FIGHT! Judges at ringside do not have acceass to their information. You should only score a fight with the same information as ringside judges, your own eyes.
     
  4. purephase

    purephase Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,740
    89
    Jan 14, 2011
    What number do you want? I'm supposed to go and count up punches for every fight since I find CompuBox useless? Spare me; I felt this way long before this weekend, and I don't need even its problematically derived round-by-round stats in order to score a fight. CompuBox's flaws make it useless (even if it provides the only number you get), unless you're a show producer who wants to flash things on the screen or a fan of a fighter supported by such numbers. I don't give a damn if the people operating it are doing ther darndest to be objective; it still says very little about what went on in the ring aside from a very coarse measure of relative activity levels.
     
  5. angelos

    angelos Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,623
    1
    Dec 8, 2007
    judges scored the bout on what they saw and surprise surpirse it matches with the compubox stats. You cannot win a fight by having a dominating 4 rounds only. The rest you can count by yourself who is throwing and landing more. Pac won and the best Marquez could have got is a draw.
     
  6. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    84
    May 30, 2009
    My scoring is impeccable and insanely objective.
     
  7. pejevan

    pejevan inmate No. 1363917 Full Member

    18,163
    2
    May 24, 2006
    here is how it is using compubox round by round and how the judges scored the fight:

    Round 1 : Pac 11 punches connected, JMM 7 punches
    Hoyle, Moretti, Trowbridge - Pac round 10-9

    Round 2 : Pac 9 punches connected, JMM 8 punches
    Hoyle, Trowbridge - Pac round
    Moretti - JMM round


    Round 3 : Pac and JMM both had 10 punches
    Hoyle, Trowbridge, Moretti - Pac round


    Round 4 : Pac 15, JMM 12
    Hoyle, Trowbridge, Moretti - JMM round


    Round 5 - Pac 13, JMM 12
    Hoyle, Moretti, and Trowbridge - JMM round


    Round 6 - Pac 15, JMM 10 punches
    All three -Pac round


    Round 7 - Pac 21, JMM 12
    all three - JMM round


    Round 8 - Pac 11, JMM 13 punches
    Moretti, Trowbridge - Pac round
    Hoyle - JMM round

    Round 9 - both 17 punches connected
    Moretti, Trowbridge - Pac
    Hoyle - JMM

    Round 10 - Pac 18, JMM 13
    Moretti, Trowbridge - Pac
    Hoyle JMM

    Round 11 - Pac 18, JMM 13
    Hoyle, Trowbridge - Pac
    Moretti - JMM

    Round 12 - Pac 18, JMM 11
    Hoyle, Moretti - Pac
    Trowbridge - JMM

    The three rounds that JMM had cleaner punch were tallied as such.