My card: 5-3-4 Marquez. My thoughts: You're all crazy if you think JMM was robbed.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by EpsilonAxis, Nov 14, 2011.


  1. Englund

    Englund Warrior Full Member

    2,545
    3
    Feb 17, 2010
    Precisely why people are ending up with so many different scores.
     
  2. boxingfanneato

    boxingfanneato what would MORALES do! Full Member

    2,850
    2
    Jan 2, 2010
    im willing to bet that if we ask 100 boxing journalus how many of the three fights did they score for marquez and 95% of people will have him winning atleast one fight, how did the judges not see 1 for marquez is beyond me.
     
  3. r2d2

    r2d2 HATERS GONNA HATE! Full Member

    1,534
    0
    May 4, 2009
    Have you judge a professional boxing? If no, then shutup! your scorecard doesnt count.
     
  4. EpsilonAxis

    EpsilonAxis HNIC Full Member

    6,491
    2
    Jul 24, 2004
    :lol::lol::lol:
     
  5. difO

    difO Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,682
    0
    Dec 13, 2009
    see i dont see how you can give the first round as even? pacquiao landed more punches than marquez. marquez had two flurries to the body, with 4 punches landing and even one of those partially blocked. pac landed more punches, straight to the face and also pressed the action...
     
  6. Fighting Pride

    Fighting Pride Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,538
    1
    Feb 12, 2009
    The rounds were that close. Fairer to give a draw in an even round than a 10-9 to any of the fighters based on just one or two punches they may have landed near the end.
     
  7. this_and_that

    this_and_that Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,697
    351
    Oct 13, 2010
    Finally some sense in ESB.
    I always thought it will come to this after the hype and emotions settled down.

    I think the obvious thing to point out is the Marquez rounds (for me it's, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 8 ) were clear as day for Marquez, but the Pac rounds AS IT HAS ALWAYS BEEN FOR 3 FIGHTS NOW, is almost always a toss up, save maybe for round 1 and round 4.

    Anybody crying a robbery is a butthurt fan boy.
    People calling this fight unexciting are plain haters.
    People saying Pac looked subpar clearly didn't watch their 2 previous fights as outside of the KD's, this Pac has been best at blocking and evading the punches while still unleashing a beting on JMM's face. This is the only time that he landed JMM, FYI.
    JMM however humbled tons of people (myself included). He was simply spectacular that evening.
     
  8. Exactabox

    Exactabox Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,059
    8
    Feb 13, 2010
    Rd 3 & 6 pac landed his right hook at will. was 2 of the biggest Pac rounds in every way.
     
  9. this_and_that

    this_and_that Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,697
    351
    Oct 13, 2010
    I remember that on round 3, not sure about round 6 though.
    Thing is, the landed punches were so even, but it appeared more to me that JMM was controlling the tempo of those particular rounds which is why I handed 'em to him.
     
  10. pahapoisu

    pahapoisu Superman! Full Member

    7,824
    2
    Jul 5, 2010
    :lol: Most score the way they want to...
    Incredibly hard ? :rofl

    117-111 is what i had for Marquez. This was the easiest fight to score out of the three.
    Just look at Pacquiao after the final bell. He knew he lost.
     
  11. ko_bros

    ko_bros Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,088
    2
    Nov 13, 2008
    People are crying robbery because Pac got the decision twice on a very close fights. He was on the better end of these decisions in the whole trilogy. It was time to pay some respect to another ATG. Marquez deserved at least one W on his record instead Pac got one when in fact he actually looked bad during the fight compared to Marquez. If Marquez would have won one of the previous fights, people would take his loss a lot easier.
     
  12. liger05

    liger05 puroresu fan 4 life!! Full Member

    4,101
    21
    Nov 11, 2008
    It was close but JMM had it by at least a couple of rounds. There is no way Pacman won by 4 rounds as one judge had it. That was an absurd scorecard.
     
  13. Flawless

    Flawless Member Full Member

    196
    0
    Jul 27, 2008
    This is one the biggest robbery in boxing history. This was the clearest fight out of the trilogy where JMM was the clear winner. Another disgusting moment in boxing history, thanks to Top Rank
     
  14. EpsilonAxis

    EpsilonAxis HNIC Full Member

    6,491
    2
    Jul 24, 2004
    You have not watched nearly enough boxing if you honestly think that.

    I could create a looooong list of worse decisions if you'd like.
     
  15. Powerman55

    Powerman55 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,295
    0
    Nov 26, 2008
    I agree with all of this.