Pac - JMM III - What fight were you watching?

I've rewatched it numerous time's and come out with 116-113 Marquez every time

 

i get where ur coming from but if the underdog is actually doing good its more than just the emotional fluff

underdogs have won and legitimately before not just based on shock factor

and non mexicans would have got excited from Juans punches he landed some good ones

and punch stat does not always tell the story

i see where your coming from with some of this but Juan has a strong case

 

Tasco you're a fine poster but I can't agree with you here. I rewatched it in HD and Manny didn't land significant punches for a long stretch of the middle fight. Marquez won his rounds clearly with hard effective punches, and Manny never won a round clear. It may be close round-by-round because of a few rounds at the start and at the end, but there's no way I can believe Pacquiao won 6 rounds of that fight, and 7 would be downright dishonest.

If you could post you're scorecard that would be something to look at.

 

Scored it 7-5 Marquez the first time and then 8-4 Marquez upon rewatching it.

So upon first view I thought it was a close fight, then I rewatched and I saw the robbery everyone spoke of, Pac was missing non stop. Those compubox numbers and Lederman's card were an absolute joke. This was damn near a new generation Lewis/Holyfield.

 

even among those who scored it for JMM there is no consensus at to which rounds he won and which ones he lost. There are 9 rounds that even people who scored the fight for Marquez gave to Pac. Fights are scored round by round, and each round is an individual contest from the others.

 

Why do you guys continue to believe you can tell someone else how they scored a fight? You can say you don't agree with someone's scorecard, or how they scored the fight if they break down how they did it.. But I've seen several threads were Pac fans claim people scored it for JMM because Pac didn't look his best, or JMM was the underdog, or they didn't do it by rounds.. WTF are you basing that off of? Wishful thinking?

 

pac**** lost

 

all of a sudden people here are better than professional boxing judges. lol funny!

 

Better than the corrupt judges Arum paid off, yep.

Dont believe me? Just ask the majority of the boxing world, including many pro boxers which would include some of Pac's sparring partners. :deal

 

watching it right now. 5-2 jmm

 

All of the sudden number lies, it didnt previously

 

And a shitty flurry that lands one small punch but the flurry excites fans doesn't mean that wins the round.




Fights are scored by rounds and in those rounds, you score who won it.

I score mine rounds by a second by second basis.

So if Pac throws a combo, lands two punches and JMM counters back and lands one really hard punch that snaps Pac head back. I have it even.

Pac on my card didn't win a round after the first until the 12th.

I'll rescore it on HD on saturday.

 

would rather rewatch the Alvarado Presscot match.