Most amusing Pacquiao fan excuse for the loss?

I don't really care about people in the game. Most of those names aren't surprising, b-hop would always give the edge to the counter puncher. That is confirmation bias. I will not score professional boxing like its amateurs. The people who are arguing for JMM are really asking for pro-boxing to look like amateurs where two counter punchers are afraid to throw.

I already gave my card.

1, 2, 3, 6, 10, 11, 12 JMM could have won if Nacho hadn't told him to put it on cruise.

 

jmm: "I want the next fight in Mexico, with mexican judges, i want pacquiao to stop punching me" lol

 

The stepping on foot and hair excuses are classic. Only *******s could come up with half this ****.

 

but the judges scored it for Pac,

LOL

which mattered

their "professionals" too, "people in the fight game" like you said

HAHHA

 

Can I vote for all of them?

 

New legal name for Pac.

Many 'excuses' Pacquiao

 

atleast i tried, so much for no excuses...think what you want to think if it helps you sleep at night...well, goodluck trying though:hey

 

I voted for all of them, because they're all equally as ridiculous.

 

No I'm not goign to let other people effect my own card. I scored it how I scored it. At the 9th round I thought JMM was going to win it. I had him up by 1. But then Nacho lost it. Loud mouths aren't going to make me change my card. It is what it is.

You style doesn't mean that ring generalship and effective aggression are no longer part of the scoring. Your style doesn't change the rules. When you choose to be a counter puncher you also choose to risk loosing those close decisions to the more active fighter. Its a choice you make. If the JMM from the first two fights had shown up he may well have won but he went in there with a pure counter punching strategy and it cost him important rounds. You cannot win those close rounds on counter punching alone. He has no one to blame but himself and Nacho.

I've heard a lot of people saying that the only way its 115-113 is if you give the close rounds to Manny. Yes I gave all the close rounds to Manny. How else do you give close rounds? If the round is close punching and defense are usually even. Its ring generalship and effective aggression that wins those rounds and Manny beat JMM every time in those two departments. Please make some logical argument how those close rounds should go to JMM.

 

This content is protected

Drinking **** between rounds was the best one