Most amusing Pacquiao fan excuse for the loss?

The way haters see it don't count but the judges do. just suck it up then.

 

And the last time I checked, Whitaker drew with Chavez... stop acting the ****.

Ps. it was actually a MD, not a SD... but it should have been a UD... in JMMs favour.

 

You cant possibly think the fight was that clear cut. Please tell me how counter punching alone wins close rounds when you make no attempt to be the aggressor or control the ring which is 1/2 of scoring? The problem here is dumb fans who cant score a fight. If JMM had made any attempt to win the fight in the last 3 round he may well have earned a win or draw on my card. He didn't so he lost 115-113.

 

He landed the more accurate, crisper punches.

 

Its a close round. Both fighters were landing accurate crisp punches. You see JMM because he is slow enough that your eye sees it better. Thats your fault no one elses. The punches were pretty much even. That is usually what makes it a close round. In those close rounds its effective aggression and ring generalship 1/2 of the scoring that wins it. You are asking for the rules to be changed to your favor.

 

I watched the fight with foreign commentary (Russian I think) & scored it round by round, there were a few close rds but the only man that won any clear rds was Marquez, he landed the better punches in just about every round... if you actually sat & scored this fight round by round & came up with a Pacquiao win then it is YOU that does not know how to score a fight.

Pacman never won a single round in that fight in a clear manner - fact !

 

EFFECTIVE aggression & aggression are 2 different things, Pacquiao simply wasn`t effective enough.

Its not about suiting me, I wanted Pac to win in style so that the bookies would give me decent odds when I was putting some big bucks on Mayweather to beat Pacquiao... now thats all ****ed up so cut the **** about this suiting me.

Go watch & score the fight in mute or in a foreign language, in other words without those biased sacks of **** HBO commentating, then we can talk.

 

Uh the 3rd and the 6th. Exactly how many round do you think JMM won clearly? I only see the 5th and 7th for JMM. What other rounds do you think were total domination for Marquez?

 

He was landing is that not effective? He landed more punches through his aggression than JMM did with his counter punching.

How about you go **** yourself if you think the commentators effect my scoring *******!

 

Wrong Socks. :rofl

 

The car door excuse was beautiful.

 

Pac's most prevalent excuses seem to be foot/leg related.


Wrong socks.
leg cramps.
Foot stomping
Bad shoes
Calf muscles too big to carry around for 12 rounds!

 

..and JMM showed Ring Generalship throught out the entuire fight, while Manny showed INEFFECTIVE agression.

 

The "Clear rounds JMM won" thread was a total fail. Should tell you something.

 

His aggression was landing punches. How is it ineffective? And how is backing up ring generalship? Now you are just outright lying. You can argue that his counter punching won some rounds its true I gave him 4 rounds for it. But his lack of aggression and generalship cost him the close ones especially when Nacho made him put it on cruise.