i think Pacquiao won the first and thrid fight but lost the second one. All fights are extremelyt close though. JMM is Pacquiao's kryptonite. This is a case of the kryptonite having a hard time beating his nemesis
Marquez dominated and was robbed, again. Those who scored it for Marquez have an agenda toward objectivity. *******s... well that speaks for it self. "It was the hair." "It was the shoes." "He stepped on his foot!"
Dominated? atsch Yeah, see your comment above. NO ONE was dominated. :roll: Yes, focus on things like this. Seems more suited for your type of discussion.
I have Pacquiao winning all three fights and I am a fan of both of them. They were all close fights, but I think Pacquiao won them, so I agree with the T.S.
I had Pac winning all 3 fights. I don't have a problem with people scoring all 3 for JMM, though. It's the robbery claims that perturb me.
He ****ing dominated Lance. If anyone's going to play the ******* troll trolley, then I'm going to fire back in the other extreme. The funny thing is I'm still actually closer to the truth. Where do you get the credibility to try to knock me down a peg as a poster? I haven't seen an ounce of substance from you on any of these Pac-Marquez threads. Hell, I haven't seen substance from you maybe ever. I just see you get into petty quarrels with Floyd fans over nonsense. That's the only thing you seem to come to ESB to do. You barely talk boxing.
nah ... he was schooled by JMM in the first fight ..... both of them improved since then PAC boxes better while Marquez improved his chin and concentration
and how did pac do enough guy, missed alot of punches , lost the battle of position , dont even start with compubox bull**** either ,