Compubox is a Bunch of Crap

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Thread Stealer, Jan 7, 2010.


  1. bRoNeR**a**G

    bRoNeR**a**G Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,755
    2
    Mar 10, 2011
    Its a workrate and accuracy counter, but it's flawed because of human error and biases.
     
  2. pipe wrenched

    pipe wrenched ESB ELITE SQUAD Full Member

    29,921
    35
    Mar 31, 2007
    It's the "Compu" part that throws off folks that don't realize it's humans pushing a button at their discretion.
     
  3. pipe wrenched

    pipe wrenched ESB ELITE SQUAD Full Member

    29,921
    35
    Mar 31, 2007

    You are right. It CAN be seen sometimes that the humans pushing the button to count punches are paid by HBO the same as the commentators who sometimes have an agenda.
     
  4. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    396,089
    78,340
    Nov 30, 2006
    HomoBox - while more accurate - doesn't quite have the same ring. :!:
     
  5. pipe wrenched

    pipe wrenched ESB ELITE SQUAD Full Member

    29,921
    35
    Mar 31, 2007

    Fine point....:lol:
     
  6. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
    Those who don't like Compubox now sure liked it when it gave stats to their boxers, such as Williams!
     
  7. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    396,089
    78,340
    Nov 30, 2006
    ...or they're the same people who felt Williams lost and disagreed with Compbux then, too? Or are you so special, Farmy, that ONLY YOU can see through all the mirages?
     
  8. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    41,891
    3,270
    Jun 30, 2005
    Compubox is good for measuring workrate. That's about it.
     
  9. Chris85

    Chris85 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,140
    1
    May 6, 2009
    Thats the reason why you have the judges as well :good
     
  10. purephase

    purephase Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,740
    89
    Jan 14, 2011
    Dude as, you can see above, you were on the first page of this thread bitching about it yet have been spamming Pacquiao-Marquez numbers all over the board, and you want to call others hypocrites?
     
  11. caneman

    caneman 100% AllNatural Xylocaine Full Member

    16,472
    1
    Aug 5, 2009
    I wish they would come out with a post fight Compubox system where the fight is reviewed in slow motion by a larger panel of judges and compare them to the live Compubox statistics. It is possible as it is not rocket science.
     
  12. purephase

    purephase Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,740
    89
    Jan 14, 2011
    People have done this for individual rounds and found it was completely off.
     
  13. FORMIDABLE

    FORMIDABLE Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,664
    6
    Jan 12, 2010
    Compubox is a big reason I hate watching HBO telecasts. They always display punch stats after a round and they do let it influence their scoring and how they call the fight. Mayweather-De La Hoya was the worst case I've seen. They had Floyd well ahead by the mid rounds based on BS compubox stats which counted for Floyd blocked punches and punches hitting gloves and arms as having landed.
     
  14. TheBling

    TheBling Active Member Full Member

    982
    0
    Jul 28, 2010
    So when we talk about Floyd, he's the most accurate puncher in compubox history

    But when Pac out lands Marquez's compubox stats, it's overrated and biased....
     
  15. Chris85

    Chris85 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,140
    1
    May 6, 2009
    The judges and compubox both gave it to pac.

    Judge scores wernt good enough and so gave you the compubox numbers as an additional proof (crap or not)

    Whats wrong?