Most amusing Pacquiao fan excuse for the loss?

:yep

 

Juan was controlling the pace of the fight and was making manny fight Juan's fight..Thats Ring Generalship...and everytime Manny landed Juan would come back and counter him. So yes, i suggest you watch the fight without hyearing HBO's biased comments.

 

Bold writing one - you clearly have no understanding of the sport of boxing so you really merit no further response from anyone.

Bold 2 - you evidently watched the fight either on HBO and were influenced by the commentary or have been influenced by people who were affected in this way. Either way again you merit no real response.

P.S Pac landed **** all.. to which you are now going to give me compubox numbers or show me a pic of JMM's face which again shows you no **** all about boxing.

 

Leg Cramps
Sore Feet
JMM stepping on his foot

 

The TS failed to mention that a lot of these threads were created by newly registered accounts. And these nabs can be anyone, even *****s. This has be done before and people are still falling for it...

 

I try to explain that it happens all the time between lefty and orthodox but nobody lessened

 

What an old thread. I'd say the wrong socks excuse would be the funniest.

 

almost all typical Pac ultra fans were citing the leg stepping excuse which in itself shows total lack of boxing knowledge which in itself is not fatal it's a forum they could learn. But they don't want to ...

 

:rofl

 

No Manny was the one controlling the pace of the fight. All exchanges where at his discression not JMM. Backing up is not ring generalship. And no he wasn't getting countered everytime and when he did JMM still lost the exchanges. You are scoring boxing like an amature.

As for the comments I scored the fight nothing like HBO so shut the **** up. I say you watch it without the mexican fans oohing and aahhing every time JMM lands a fleetap.

Backing up is not ring generalship. The aggressor is the one who controls the pace when that is all you are doing. You clearly know nothing of boxing. If backing up was all it took there would be some boring boring fights.

And I say you were influenced by oohing and ahhing mexican fans.

I saw the punches landing. I still see them landing. You don't have **** all to prove otherwise. Where is your evidence that Manny wasn't landing the shots? Your entire case is that compubox was bull**** with no evidence. I wasn't even basing my cards on compubox. I score it by the minute you dumb ****. Compubox just after the fact confirmed what I saw and scored. SO no I'm not going to post compubox numbers I'm going to post what I saw and scored. If compubox agreed with you your dumb ass would be the one all over it like all *****s.

The point is that you dont have a response. JMM lost the close rounds because of ring generalship and effective aggression. Thats the fact. You are basing you entire case on the lie that Manny wasn't landing punches which you cant prove because we all saw it. Instead you chose to attack compubox. Shut the **** up. Its pathetic. You know I'm right. No matter how much you talk about crisp punching there is no such thing. A punch either lands flush or it does not. My fridge has a crisper, fruits and vegetables are crisp. There is no such thing as a crisp punch. Its a bull**** word made up by *****s. Pretty punching does not make the punch more effective. There is no difference between a JMM counter right or a Manny right hook. Both land flush both are considered clean effective punching. The right hook probably did more damage too because orthedox fighters never see it coming. I suggust you quit sucking the ***** dick and read Dempsey s book then you might learn something about boxing you dumb****. Dempsey would kick your ass if you ever tried to talk about "crisp" punching.

 

Maybe but when a douche starts 30 threads in 2 days with a newly registered account, don't give him credibilty or you are playing along with his game.

 

yeah hahah the hair thread was made by an alt I guess and I hope haha

 

Off topic:

I've been a Pacquiao fan since he was fighting @ 106lbs. Pac vs JMM III: he might've won via aggression and punches landed on the score cards but sad to say JMM got the better of him that night, knew exactly how to fight him.

On topic:

Would it still be possible to add "You dimwit, it was Bobby Pacquiao not Manny fighting with JMM, you blind?" hehe

 

What on earth were you watching? Marquez controlled range and distance with his footwork while countering beautifully, when Manny got too aggressive he made Marquez look like Pernell Whitaker, occasionally a glancing shot would connect but that fight was basically Marquez giving Manny a boxing lesson. The left jab and uppercut caught Manny every time, Manny looked unbalanced and wild in there. I wouldn't even say Manny was aggressive in the fight, he looked hesitant because he couldn't match Marquez's footwork. To land anything he had to take punches and just charge in. Manny when he was aggressive was the picture perfect definition of ineffective aggression.
You need to learn boxing. **** Dempsey, he was a fighter not a boxer, he has zero relevance to a modern day counter puncher in a lighter weight division.

 

New excuse, marquez was waiting for me to punch. LMAO