Unbiased RBR scoring in slow-motion of Pac-JMM III

Nice thread. :good

 

unrill he has Marquez winning?

 

Absolutely pointless, you might as well go off compubox round stats.

You will also be the first unbiased ******* on ESB too.

 

No. I dont' care who you have winning , as long you don't have it a landslide or call it a robbery.

 

The only criticism is judges don't see fights in slow-mo. I'm probably one of the only few people that thought round 6 was not a clear Pac round. Anyway, pretty solid card. Pac has to sweep the last 3 to get a draw on your card. Round 10 & 12 are close, I believe I had both as a 10-10 round (Definitely round 10).

And while I had Round 6 for Marquez, I think I had round 4 a 10-10 round.

As you have pointed out, it's rather clear Marquez wins his round more clearly, more often.

 

9-3 Marquez. Worst robbery in the last 52 years.

 

4 6 10 11 12 pac

 

STFU idiot.

 

Appreciate the breakdown, will have to rewatch and compare to my card.

 

Problem with that is judges can't score rounds as a 10 10.

 

It's frowned upon, but not illegal as far as I understand it.

 

i had it 116-112
then 115-113 both for jmm

need to watch it again and record round with detail for you guys, not sure if you guys care though :L

 

I watched the fight 6 times in super slow motion on my 72 inch, LCD, 3D tv. I also watched it with my uncle who is a top boxing referee and my other uncle who is a high level boxing judge, who has been in the business over 20 years. All of us scored it 9-3. Worst robbery in the last 52 years. So you STFU idiot.

 

I think they can but it is just rare.

 

After 6 rounds I scored it even still need to watch the last 6 again:


P-M
10-9
9-10
10-9
10-9
9-10
9-10


I couldn't giv PAC the 6th IMO because he wasn't as effective as JMM IMO