I am sick to the back teeth of vile bumsteaks who can't score fights.

You do realize that you're not toeing the party line on this one :yep

Agree with your post otherwise

 

Lots of close rounds. Close rounds go to the aggressor always have always will. You just want new rules so your guy can win.

Dont lecture on how to score fights.

 

But fights are not to be scored for ineffective aggression, which is why your guy won, not because he actually was effective.

 

Great thread GJE, this past Saturday really seperated the Pacquiao fans from the *******s. The most anyone could (logically) score it was a draw and that was if they were really giving a lot of close rounds to Pacquiao but how anyone scored it 116-112 like the agenda driven hack Harold Lederman is beyond me.

 

couldnt agree more. HBO full of ******s

 

Scoring is subjective especially in close fights...

 

don't mind that cretin. He's made statements in the past that would make a boxing professor cry.



When asked who's the better counter puncher between Nichilino Lochhe, Pernell Witaker or Manny Pacquiao? he replied

 

Because if fights are scored on the highlights of the fights which are less than 10 in total of 12 rounds, then you are not a good judge.

 

That avatar brings back terrific memories of the Team Elite Awards where I picked up two sensational awards. What a fantastic night.:happy

 

Here's the now infamous attempt by fragile Nancy Popkins to support his/her 'opinion' that Pacquiao won;

and I quote

"It couldn’t have been Marquez. No way on earth did he win eight rounds, whereas the case for Pacquiao winning eight was strong. He threw and landed more punches and was the aggressor."

:dead:dead:dead

 

This. Anyone who scored it to Pacquiao can't score a fight, simple as. It really goes no further than that.