I am sick to the back teeth of vile bumsteaks who can't score fights.

Agree 100%


Nothing against honest Pac fans. But any one who thinks JMM walked out of there with only 4 Rounds in the bank is beyond stupid.


I had it 7-5 Marquez, and thought Marquez won 6 clear rounds while Manny won 4 clear rounds. I know close rounds can be go either way, but I think as a judge you have to be able to really decide who was the most effective fighter each round.


Aggression, while being pummeled about, is not what scores it for me. You don't give every semi-close round to the aggressor. I don't care which one is the champ or challenger. ****ing ******ed.

 

You better watch out...that dude is gonna start calling you names because you're not buying his meaning of ring generalship!:rofl

 

Popkins is a guy who clearly knows his boxing, I'm surprised he'd let bias cloud his judgement in this instance. That comment you just posted is nonsense and it's a shame to see.

 

Ohh Lord!!!:roflatsch

 

I believe you're right.
Some *******s actually set there bias aside this time as they could'nt stomach saying Pacquiao deserved a decision when he was outright schooled.

Props to huge Pac fans Patsys, dhenrae, and I'm certain a few others.

Feel free to post the names of the *******s who scored for Marquez and graduated to become boxing fans.:happy

 

i remember that creatine lampley saying judges score fights for the aggressor. how can u give the fight to the aggressor when most of his punches hit nothing but air?

 

If Pac beat JMM, then JCC beat Pea.

 

I like Team elite. But they are getting a bit laxed with their recruitment.

Seems like any bum hole, with a boxing knowledge of a turnip can get in.:deal

 

That's from an article he posted from the examiner, apparently he wasn't to happy when people told him it was ****.

 

If that was true they'd have made you a member years ago. :deal

 

:nutcase

 

Nice vcash total bro!

We're u born ******ed or did u grow into it.....