More outrageous outcome: Pac-JMM III or Williams-Lara

Is this a serious question?

 

Williams-Lara without a doubt!

 

Williams-Lara should have been investegated.

 

:rofl... I see what you're doing:yep

 

definitely Williams-Lara...that was HIGHWAY ROBBERY

 

Lol

 

Lara-Williams was the worse robbery I feel, from memory, but the stakes weren't as nearly as high and that's what compounds the rage of the fans.

 

Is this a joke.

The JMM-Pac fight is

115-113
113-115
114-114

116-112 as an outlier on some cards.

Its not even close the Lara-Williams. We just have some butt hurt people who would rather have it 115-113 other way and some crazies who score it 118-110 but those people are just ****ing insane.

 

The rage of the fans isnt really the topic of discussion... The TS was simply trying to shed a little light on what constitutes a legitimate Robbery in boxing vs a close, competitive fight. I think he made his point.

 

I didn't see Williams-Lara, but the just because one fight is viewed as a bigger robbery than another, doesn't mean both fights aren't robberies.

 

:deal

 

No it wasn't a robbery it was a close fight. I take pride in how I score my fights. I had it 115-113 Pac because Marquez blew it. Had he continued doing what he would have won on my card. I'm not a corrupt judge in Arum's pocket and I had it very close to two of the judges.

 

Lara vs Williams without a doubt!

You should of added Sergio Martinez vs Kermit Cintron in there too.

 

I think its possible for a fight to be close, yet still be a clear winner. If the person who most perceived as the winner doesn't get the decision, it can be considered a robbery. I fell like that was the case in JMM-Pac 3. I too, am not a corrupt judge in anyones pocket.

You have to realize you are in a small minority regarding the JMM-Pac fight.