Enough with this Slow-Motion Crap.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by ripcity, Nov 17, 2011.


  1. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,449
    51
    Dec 5, 2006
    When judging a fight no matter what your critera is for scoring a round you should try to put yourself in a suittion that is as close to what a official boxing judge expreances. Watching a fight in slow-motion is not an opition for a judge and it should not be one for you the same thing goes for Compubox and Punchstat.
     
  2. Jordan_Davies

    Jordan_Davies Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,502
    0
    Jul 28, 2011
    In Soviet russia . . . . JMM still wins the ****ing fight

    Get over it, Marquez landed the better punches
     
  3. Derrick_Rose

    Derrick_Rose Guest

    ****ing Stevie Wonder scored that fight 8-4 for Marquez!
     
  4. MrOliverKlozoff

    MrOliverKlozoff The guy in shades Full Member

    1,482
    6
    Mar 12, 2011
    We shouldn't take advantage of slow motion because judges don't have it? That's the most idiotic thing I've heard today. Understanding that the judges didn't have that benefit is one thing, but that's no reason to stop ourselves.
     
  5. Chris85

    Chris85 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,140
    1
    May 6, 2009
    Is this because slow motion tell different story?

    I bet it does :deal
     
  6. Malden

    Malden 006 Full Member

    14,631
    1
    Aug 18, 2011
    :lol:
     
  7. megavolt

    megavolt Constantly Shadowboxing Full Member

    13,622
    34
    Dec 25, 2009
    The reason we have these "robberies" is because of the dispute of judging accuracy. The better the judge, the better his eyes are at catching things and being able to compare real-time and slow motion allows people to bring a fair judgement comparable to a judge with the perfect eyes.
     
  8. prelude

    prelude Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,924
    7
    Nov 12, 2010
    Ofcourse it's not but it proofs what really happen or who really won. For years I always thought Torrecampo land a whooping nuts shot on PAC to get the KO. Not until recently that I saw a slowMo clip where the shot landed on PAC chin and bounced down to his chest...legit KO. But in your case why are people complaining if the judges scored for PAC if they were there and not watching slowMo :lol:.
     
  9. Chris85

    Chris85 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,140
    1
    May 6, 2009
    Watching slow mo makes the *****s, pisstards and haters goes blind. :deal
     
  10. prelude

    prelude Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,924
    7
    Nov 12, 2010
    Not all judges have the same mentality, some score more for boxer, some score more for aggressor. In PAC case they scored for the aggressor.
     
  11. prelude

    prelude Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,924
    7
    Nov 12, 2010
    Marquez: I'm not going to run like coward Mosley and I'm coming to KO PAC.

    Watching it in slowMo: All I see is the ring rope coming out of Marquez face and exiting in Pacquiao face :lol:.
     
  12. Chris85

    Chris85 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,140
    1
    May 6, 2009
    Pisstards et all : "Foot clash is common in southpaw vs orthodox, do you box?"

    *******s : "Then show me more evidence of this common ocurrence"

    Pisstards et all : Goes all quite and avoid the thread

    :rofl
     
  13. KO KIDD

    KO KIDD Loyal Member Full Member

    30,200
    5,796
    Oct 5, 2009
    slow mo is cool when trying to pick the fight apart and understand every little thing in depth for an analysis

    but like the op said the judges dont have that luxury they also dont zoom in or have fancy camera angles

    if ya wanna grade judges for their cards you gotta judge to their limitations of judging

    but if you wanna analyze it than slow mo is ok
     
  14. FORMIDABLE

    FORMIDABLE Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,664
    6
    Jan 12, 2010
    Judges should watch fights behind a sound proof booth with replays, different angles and slo mo available to them.