Yawn. I swear I scored objectively. Believe that or don't, not interested in debating it any further, no point.
Its a 10-9 rd that was a mistake. getting late.atschatsch U give rd1 to JMM only if u like nacho up ur ass...:scaredas:
Much like the judges, I only watched it once, live. I also scored a draw lol Great minds... note, I'm also biased for Marquez but him losing that last round..was a let down.
What a lie. This is an invalid argument type that is called poisoning the well eg the Pope has no right to comment on the existence of God because he is bias. It is a way of ignoring the views of a certain group of people, fallaciously of course. I agree that boxing is difficult to judge and that the fight had a few close rounds, but looking at the fight as a whole you can not say that PAC was the better fighter. He was beaten in almost every exchange. If someone decided to give PAC every close round the fight might be closer to a draw, but how is it fair to give all the close rounds to one fighter?
Just finished watching the fight for a second time, sound turned off. I have Marquez winning by 2 rounds. 115-113 Marquez Round 5 is proof positive that compubox is ****.
That's insanity mate. Round 1 is much closer to a 10-10 than it is a 10-8 to Manny. It's a nip and tuck round where Manny just did a little bit more work and edged it to deserve a 10-9 IMO.