Unbiased RBR scoring in slow-motion of Pac-JMM III

Me mother****er. And everybody else with a brain and half a ****ing clue.

 

Credible? Bob Arum hired two of the judges. Literally. Do you know how this **** works? You aren't trying to make a point. It's pathetic how you ethnic nationalists would cling to a fake victory like this. Pacquiao wasn't even close to winning that fight. CLEAR victory for Marquez and you still argue?? You STFU you ****ing baby. Suck on Pacquiao's dick some more.

 

That's a racial barb. Ban this racist bigot. I'm not Mexican, cat eater.

 

Your blind.

That is all. :bart - :deal - :hi:
---------------------------

Also note: Even judge Trowbridge, who turned in the most offensively pro-Pac scorecard, still GAVE THE 12th ROUND TO MARQUEZ.

*******ism is reaching new heights of delusionism. (did I just make up a word?)

 

yup totally bias

 

go watch in slo mo, he didnt do anything in 12

 

You just can't be helped.

 

Did it occur to you that maybe I score based on both who landed more and who landed the clearer punches? If 1 guy lands 2 more but the other guy had 2 clearer shots, Id have to go with the guy who had those cleaner blows. If 1 guy outlands the other by 5 punches and the other guy only had 1 more clean shot, I'd probably go with the quantity.

Where did I say I based it on Pac's hair bouncing? You dumb? I was merely pointing out an observation that Pac's hair bounces when hit and even when he blocks and his head moves back from the block, he looks hit cos his hair bounces everywhere. This is why in rounds where they both landed the same amount of clean blows, people remember JMM's clear punches more...although watching it in slo-mo, they both landed clean shots.

Also Pac stands still and covers up to block punches, when it goes through and hits him clean you notice it a lot more, vs JMM usually trying to move away or slip the punch, either way they both get caught. Its just whichever is more eye catching to the public watching it real time.

 

1) Yes. There's been no robbery and if anything, a draw would have been a fair call, however the judges watching it live obviously preferred Pac's style and aggression. JMM DID win more clear rounds though, so scoring all close rounds "even", JMM would come out on top, I guess thats why most score it for JMM. However it was so close and you dont score all those rounds even, the fight really could have gone either way depending on who was judging.

2) I already made a thread saying the exact same thing. Its the same as how many had Morales beating Maidana, it was shocking. Everyone was expecting a KD from Pac minimum or to dominate the round, anything else = fail.

3) I think my numbers and compubox numbers (both pretty close to each other) shows Pac was landing and landing more. Both were being affected by each others punch, JMM wouldn't have looked like that and Pac would have simply tried to walk through him if he wasnt feeling those counters.

 

youre scoring it base on how Pacs hair bounces, but you didnt take into account that JMMs hair is short

you also mentioned that Pac landed more, but you gave it to JMM because Pacs hair is bouncing,

 

I just said the 11th was Pac's clearest round.

 

Read the sentence. "Pac landed more but IMO JMM looked better in his combinations."

I was pointing out why JMM's punches were easier to identify specially when they were clean, because Pac's hair bounced. God.

I scored that round for JMM because Pac would land a potshot here in there, JMM would throw a combination and Pac would stand there and block MOST of it, however 1 gets through and its clean.

 

Sorry, for some reason I read it as "closest" rather than "clearest" atsch

Was probably tired from watching the fight in slo-mo