Pac-Marquez III Scorecard & A Few Comments

:rofl:roflatsch

Team Elite and ChinCheckers' conclusion - Clear Marquez win and disgraceful robbery.:dead:deal

 

I like both fighters and it was close, however Marquez was stomping on Pac's feet way to maney times. I know this common when a orthodox fighter fights a southpaw but this looked intentional. i would like to see a fourth fight.

 

I'm pretty sure Pacquiao will be. Not sure with Maquez. He knows what happens if he tries to go offensive on Pacquiao.

 

HBO is an important part, their commentary is very leading, they cheerlead and emphasise everything Pacquaio does while negating and criticising everything Marquez did. They make it sound Pacquaio is doing far better than he was and this does make viewers believe the fight was closer than it in fact was, especially novice fans. Then there was Letterman's absolute joke of a scorecard, when does he ever get it right? They used to do the same for Delahoya

 

Stfu.

 

Lederman is an absolute disgrace of a fight judge.
This joke imposes different criteria to which to score from fight to fight.

Lets go to the first Marquez-Pacquiao fight.....
......forget about the 3 knockdowns in the first round....Harold Lederman is such a joke, he had Pacquiao winning 7 rounds to 5 in that first fight.
Even without the 3 knockdowns he still would have Paquiao winning the fight 115-113.atsch

There is'nt a ******* in this forum that has admitted to having given Pacquiao even 6 rounds in that fight, which tells you how off base Lederman was in scoring that fight.

 

When pac fought the come forward Ricky hatton @ jr. Welter he acted as the patient counter puncher and used hatton against himself and practically murdered him.
Why can't one of the best counter punchers in JMM hurt pac
who is right in front of him at all times ? He wasn't even as accurate as Manny in power shots. JMM can look good but doesn't have the work rate, power or next level balls to the wall attitude to beat Pac.

 

That's nothing unusual he rarely has a good card at all, it boils down to a lack of knowledge. What's worse wasn't that though but the blatant bias of the commentators

 

still butthurt **** poster? get over it ***, i know u licks jmm's balls 24/7.
have you ever think of why in three times they fought, you thought 3 times jmm had won yet judges didn't see it that way? that means you being an obsessed fan of jmm making you a delusional lover. i know being his bedmate for years will make u feel bad whenever he losses. truth be told that love can make u blind. to tell u honestly i believe the 1st encounter is a draw, 2nd is for pac, and the third is for jmm. all of the fights are really close. but to tag a poster anything u want to tag to them because their opinion is different from u tells us that you are exposed jmm's arse licker and or **** sucker:good
i know jmm is giving u good amount of money for just sitting your swollen ******* the whole day facing a computer to post his greatness everyday and how bitter he is for not having the victory, but (divac the gay) getting a life doesn't mean your getting more than enough of money. Explore the world dude, travel, get more men, cheat jmm if get caught just tell him its just a 1 night stand, or donate some of your earnings to charity, discover other things that will make you MORE happy (assuming that you're already happy with your life) :nut ewww.. I'm gonna be a little harsh on you girl, I THINK U DESERVE TO LIVE YOUR LIFE BETTER THAN THIS. don't be a ***** of someone's boxer. Try make jmm sign a blank check encash it then off to neverland with dozens of machos. If you bother to reply on me don't cry for not me retaliating. its just that i'm always busy and not re-viewing to the threads i have posted. ciao!!

 

Congratulations Divac. Your fighter pulled out another controversial loss.:smoke

 

Just rewatched it.

I scored it 115-114 Marquez. And I was liberal toward Pac last two rounds which were pretty much tied, but I gave Pac the edge.

 

Here's the thing, the rounds were close, all of them. The announcers kept talking about the volume puncher should get the rounds. But I opted for number and quality of punches landed. Based on this method here is my scorecard.

Marquez Pac
1) 9 10
2) 10 10
3) 9 10
4) 9 10
5)10 9
6) 10 9
7)10 9
8)10 9
9)10 9
10) 10 9
11) 9 10
12)9 10


115 114