The Ring Magazine: "Pacquiao won by One Point!"

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by AxlRose, Nov 21, 2011.


  1. AxlRose

    AxlRose Guest

    Anyone still questioning my scoring of the fight? :smoke

    THIS ENDS THE DEBATE!

    And this is coming from Dougie Fisher a ****ing known Marquez Hugger! :good

    See what I mean? Watch the replay without expecting a Pac blow out :smoke


    " I thought I’d score the fight for Marquez after watching the replay; instead I saw more of what Pacquiao did and scored the fight for him by one point (or 6-5-1 in rounds). Fans and media who described Pacquiao as “outclassed” or “clueless” gave Marquez more credit than he probably earned and exaggerated the Filipino hero’s flaws in my not-so-humble opinion. "


    http://ringtv.craveonline.com/blog/170293-dougies-monday-mailbag
     
  2. AxlRose

    AxlRose Guest


    Pac's hands were too darn fast for average boxing fans to see that they can't see it landing :smoke

    Look at JMM's Face :good
     
  3. pejevan

    pejevan inmate No. 1363917 Full Member

    18,163
    2
    May 24, 2006
    Dougie Fisher does not know baxing....
     
  4. homebrand

    homebrand Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,674
    3
    Jan 1, 2009
    yeah i had it 7-5 to Pac. A lot of people were over reacting to the fight being competitive, but Manny still got the win.

    I think a lot of the back lash is due to frustration that the Mayweather fight hasn't happened yet, and also Pac seems to have taken his foot off the gas somewhat. He's no longer the Tornado whirlwind who took the world by storm a few years ago. He needs to discover his old aggressive self and use shock and awe tactics to take on PBF.
     
  5. AxlRose

    AxlRose Guest

    Home brand sums it up pretty much :smoke
     
  6. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,097
    Jul 24, 2004
    The article loses all credibility from the start in the first or second sentence when it states, "sorry, there is no way Marquez won.":nut


    Sorry to state that now over a week removed from the fight there are aricles of this kind looking to build a reading backing on the hype train to the possible Pac-Mayweather showdown in the spring.
     
  7. ring magazine has always been biased for Pacquiao. Fact :lol:
     
  8. AxlRose

    AxlRose Guest

    Wtf do you even know your facts??? The Ring has always been a Golden Boy company :patsch
     
  9. AxlRose

    AxlRose Guest


    Too late I already quoted you editing your so-called FACTS :deal

    My God these Pacquiao Haters, will just do everything to discredit him :patsch

    UNBELIEVABLE..... just UNBELIEVABLE! :patsch
     
  10. Royal-T-Bag

    Royal-T-Bag Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,661
    4
    Jan 6, 2008
    :deal:deal
     
  11. gattiwarrior

    gattiwarrior Guest

    i also scored 6-5-1 for pacquaio but at least 4 of those rounds were very very hard to score

    if either fighter won by 115-113 then you couldnt complain
     
  12. Nonito Smoak

    Nonito Smoak Ioka>Lomo, sorry my dudes Full Member

    53,088
    6,684
    Sep 8, 2010
    First view: 7-5 Marquez

    Second view: 8-4 Marquez
     
  13. paulfv

    paulfv Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,853
    0
    Jul 7, 2007
    I had Pacquiao by two points, myself (115-113). But I could see a one-point Pac win as well (or other scores, because the rounds were close).
     
  14. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    260
    Jul 22, 2004
    The Ring is owned by Golden Boy who want Mayweather-Pacquaio to be huge

    EQUALS BIASED ARTICLE
     
  15. Stiltskin

    Stiltskin Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,748
    0
    Dec 28, 2010
    Honestly this **** is worse than pathetic.