If you score a fight differently for the 2nd time, it only shows your lack of ability

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by BigBone, Nov 21, 2011.


Page 1 of 5
  1. BigBone

    BigBone Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,453
    1,713
    Nov 20, 2007
    So *******s are now coming back with "for the 2nd viewing", "not watching live but home alone on tape", "watching in super slomo", "in full 3D HD", "sober", "with different commentary" and "in a different mood" :lol: somehow makes Pacquiao magically dominant...

    HEY GENIUSES! Ever occurred to you by arguing your score changes with each view and version only exposes your lack of ability to score a fight properly in the 1st place? :think

    If you know how to score a fight properly and have a pair of sharp eyes, then WHO CARES about external things? You'll have it scored pretty much the same with each view, and that's a sign you are good at it. So exactly how do you expect to convince people with sharp abilities that Pacquiao won, if your argument is that you only noticed details - Pac details no less! :lol: - for the 2nd, 3rd, 5th, 10th time?

    Ever think about logic?
     
    BigBone, Nov 21, 2011
    BigBone, Nov 21, 2011
    #1
  2. AxlRose

    AxlRose Guest

    Wrong

    Here's logic for you neandertal man :smoke

    That's why there are careers for thinking and trained men called JUDGES who don't get swayed by emotions.... :good
     
    AxlRose, Nov 21, 2011
    AxlRose, Nov 21, 2011
    #2
  3. hooligan

    hooligan Millionaire Bum Full Member

    4,499
    10
    May 8, 2006
    your done with boxing right??? why still here???
     
    hooligan, Nov 21, 2011
    hooligan, Nov 21, 2011
    #3
  4. drunkboat

    drunkboat Active Member Full Member

    996
    1
    Aug 31, 2010
    What about if the first time you were watching the fight you were getting a blow job from a hot jamaican chick with big tits?

    I think the second time you watch the fight your scores may be different.
     
    drunkboat, Nov 21, 2011
    drunkboat, Nov 21, 2011
    #4
  5. Gonzarelli

    Gonzarelli Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,063
    1
    Apr 29, 2009
    Agree with the OP. The fight was not that exciting to begin with. Anyone who was willing to sit through it again had an agenda.
     
    Gonzarelli, Nov 21, 2011
    Gonzarelli, Nov 21, 2011
    #5
  6. Robney

    Robney ᴻᴼ ᴸᴼᴻᴳᴲᴿ ᴲ۷ᴵᴸ Full Member

    92,985
    27,721
    Jan 18, 2010
    But.. bu... but... I was euh... sleep deprived... and... euh... drunk... and...

    :sad2
     
    Robney, Nov 21, 2011
    Robney, Nov 21, 2011
    #6
  7. BigBone

    BigBone Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,453
    1,713
    Nov 20, 2007
    Solid argument.
    Not saying don't watch it over and over again - it was a controlled technical masterclass given circumstances - I'm saying if you do and you have a different score with each view AND you state "truss me, Pac wins if you watch it twice/thrice", that sounds idiotic. And they are coming back with a billion threads how they see it differently...

    Would you trust a person who changes his mind every minute? If a 2nd view reveals Pacquiao secrets, why not say the 3rd reveals JMM's? We could do it forever. Or you can score properly in the 1st place.
     
    BigBone, Nov 21, 2011
    BigBone, Nov 21, 2011
    #7
  8. BigBone

    BigBone Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,453
    1,713
    Nov 20, 2007
    :lol: Yes, always trust the judges. They are not on a payroll and don't have an agenda, so there's no such thing as a bad decision or a robbery. THEY ARE TRAINED! THEY ARE THINKING! TRUSS! :patsch

    These are the people we have to argue with.
     
    BigBone, Nov 21, 2011
    BigBone, Nov 21, 2011
    #8
  9. emallini

    emallini Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    11,274
    2,538
    Mar 16, 2008
    jamaican tits are droopy bro
     
    emallini, Nov 21, 2011
    emallini, Nov 21, 2011
    #9
  10. BigBone

    BigBone Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,453
    1,713
    Nov 20, 2007
    Do you score fights when hot jamaican chicks with big tits are giving you a blow job? :think They must do a shitty job... :lol:

    I'm talking about SCORING the fight, not watching and "uh-oh I thought he won". If you take your time to SCORE the fight properly and make a RBR breakdown for the 1st time... why do you have it differently for the 2nd time when you again take your time to score the fight and make a RBR breakdown? You do the same routine... but with different results... and you ask me to trust your abilities? That's what *******s say.
     
    BigBone, Nov 21, 2011
    BigBone, Nov 21, 2011
    #10
  11. Leonard

    Leonard Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,224
    14
    Sep 19, 2009
    you sir are a professional and should replace all the judges.
     
    Leonard, Nov 21, 2011
    Leonard, Nov 21, 2011
    #11
  12. BigBone

    BigBone Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,453
    1,713
    Nov 20, 2007
    I'm not "professional" enough to "earn" big promoters trust.
     
    BigBone, Nov 21, 2011
    BigBone, Nov 21, 2011
    #12
  13. Leonard

    Leonard Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,224
    14
    Sep 19, 2009
    which is why it's boxing biggest loss, not having you judge professionally. you show these bribed and unjust judges how discerning and just you are.
     
    Leonard, Nov 21, 2011
    Leonard, Nov 21, 2011
    #13
  14. twofear

    twofear Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,140
    0
    Jun 19, 2010
    :happy Congratulations Good Sir.




    now **** off :smoke
     
    twofear, Nov 21, 2011
    twofear, Nov 21, 2011
    #14
  15. KnuckleUp99

    KnuckleUp99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,055
    1
    Jan 15, 2011
    The fight was a very good fight between great fighters. I watched it a again on HBO before the fight this weekend. I think there were a lot watching it again due to the fact they wanted to re-watch the fight because it was such a close, contraversial fight. Everyone's got an agenda.
     
    KnuckleUp99, Nov 21, 2011
    KnuckleUp99, Nov 21, 2011
    #15
Page 1 of 5