Is it easier to score close rounds in slow mo?

You just end up scoring landed shots and that is not how a fight is scored.

 

Yes, More Accurate score of the fight. But not reflective of the judges as they didn't get to watch it in Slow Mo

 

I don't think I could sit through a fight in slow mo.

It's best to watch it in real time where you can assess everything (not just punches) properly.

 

lol it would take us 2 hours or more watching an entire 12 round fight. just watch a good/clear copy and rewind the parts where you are not confident enough if you saw a clean hit or not especially in fast exchanges.

 

No because a fight is not scored by counting punches landing. In slow mo you would probably see Pac landing more but they were pitty pat punches and not clean hard shots that should count more on a scorecard (scorecard is judged by Clean punches, effective agressivness, Defence and Ring generalship) and a slow mo video would not give you a fair result unless its an amateur fight.

 

It is ******ed. Only *******s could come up with that ****

 

Pac doe Love to throw those "Pitty Pat" Punches

:huh

 

What is this slow motion **** people are on about, it's a ******* excuse for the butt kicking that Marquez gave him. Is life in slow motion? No ****tards. Score fights as you see them before your eyes.

Who could possibly sit through a whole 12 rounds in slow motion anyways?!

 

*******s

Ha...first post

 

or .... in fast motion then you see who is leading the action

 

No. You watch a fight in real time and score it. Simples.

 

Never tried it.

 

I have superfast vision and see everything.

That is why I laugh out loud when someone post that Pac did not land punches on JMM. It just shows that they have very ordinary, slow as molasses eyesight. Infact, I see the swelling in JMM's face progress millimeter by millimeter.