Pacquiao: "We cannot always win fights in one-sided fashion.”

Well I have been in a boxing ring and I'm obviously more intelligent than you as you don't seem to undertand what the word objective means.
Judges are also PAID to score in one guys favour, you'd have to be incredibly naive to believe that it doesn't happen.
If the judge understands boxing then he wouldn't be awarding rounds for ineffective aggression, that's what Pacquiao was in the Marquez fight. Not to mention Judges can be swayed by the crowd, the reason I said that everything points to a Marquez win is because the majority of neutral fans such as myself have Marquez winning, many Pacquiao fans have Marquez winning and I'm an unbiased viewer who (relatively speaking) understands boxing very well and the criteria for scoring a fight.
How is what you're saying an objective observation? You're making an assumption about what you feel the judges are feeling about the scoring of a fight that is a subjective process in the first place. That's a super subjective observation.
An objective observation involves no preconceived notions.
An objective observation is seeing Marquez land the clearer, more consistent punches while making Pacquiao hesitant, forget his right hand and fall off balance for most of the fight. I don't care for either fighter, I saw the fight and that's what I saw happen. I don't have a bias, that's an objective observation.
It's a bit hard for you to have an objective observation on a fight with Pacquiao in it when you have a Pacquiao avatar wouldn't you say?
Since this fight I'm beginning to understand what a '*******' is.....

 

Sometimes, Manny - you can not always win fights except with the aid of bought judges in the interest of protecting a multi-million dollar investment.

 

manny won, accept it, deal with it and stop whining *****!!!:hey:hey

 

Marquez beat him three times. :hi:

Stick the official records up your ass.

 

Piece of advice, learn to use the English language before you try to act like an authority on the subject :good

 

Isn't JMM one of the best combination punchers in the sport ?
How did his combination punching look vs Pac ?
It didn't exist. Yes Pac took that away from him.
JMM knew if he opened up he was done.
Stop giving credit to a fighter that did nothing to win.

JMM was going for a one punch KO from the day training camp started.
He lost clear as day and can never find a way to put Pac on his ass.
36 Rounds 3 losses. No need for 4.

 

okaaaayyyy, keep telling yourself if it helps you sleep...:rofl

 

You just owned yourself if you believe that, bro

 

That's your opinion, I thought this guy's smart, guess I was wrong :roll:

 

Like I need biased dimwits swinging from my sack.

 

Aww.. nire1982 you got owned bro, ****en owned bro.

 

Dude you've lost it. Now your just rambling....gtfoutta here with this incoherent ****. Is it that hard to indent and make a paragraph?

 

Word any objective person would say JMM clearly won, I was clearly rooting for Manny, but I had him losing 8-4, and I was being very objective. Even roach was telling Manny he needed a KO to win in round 10, I guess Roach wasn't being objective

 

do you know me smart guy?

 

keep believing that wannabe boxer