Hatton KO2, Cotto TKO12....

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Arcane, Nov 22, 2011.


  1. irishny

    irishny Obsessed with Boxing banned

    15,119
    10
    May 8, 2009
    Look at them in the ring and tell me who the bigger athlete is. Hatton was noticably stronger looking. Thicker,broader. Basically stronger looking.

    And of course he was heavier.
     
  2. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    ok how do you rate floyd's stoppage win over hatton at 147?
     
  3. wilgen99

    wilgen99 Member Full Member

    456
    0
    May 2, 2009
    Another told-you-so guy over here. :patsch

    Okay, expert. Why the hell didn't you say so before the fight that Hatton was already ****ed when he fought Pacquiao? Many lost their bets then because you were so greedy to share what you knew.

    And Cotto? Already a shell of himself and with questionable heart? Well, again you're the expert. :happy
     
  4. was a decent win but even then hatton was on the decline just that when pac got to him he was well and truly at the end of the road...
     
  5. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    so floyd fought a small hatton (like you said according to measurements like height and reach) at 147 was a decent win for floyd nevermind that his last fight at the weight against collazo, he struggled to get the win and while pac fighting a much smaller (like you said again) hatton than pacquiao was a poor win for pacquiao never mind that it was at 140, hatton's best weight, where his last fight was a total domination of the #2 ranked opponent and pacquiao did it in just 2 rounds?
     
  6. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    24
    Oct 27, 2010
    Floyd fighting Hatton was more favourable to him than Pac fighting Marquez at 144
     
  7. floyd was the bigger man and yes hatton was declining at that time, thats why is was just a decent win not great like your hyping mannys victory to be, like it has been said if malignaggi is rate number 2 in the division it says more about the strength of the division than anything else, hatton got hit with hard accuate shots all night against mayweather after that fight alone he shoulda retired but he stayed on didnt look very impressive then got ko'd by pac its not a vitory to harp on about
     
  8. this_and_that

    this_and_that Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,697
    351
    Oct 13, 2010
    Oh no no no. I don't hate. Everybody who disagrees with me DKSAB.
    Pac is a bum. Ali is a bum. Overrated journeymen. Disgusting.

    :hey
     
  9. ODLH-severly weight drained and past his best
    Ricky Hatton-way past his best, at his best not even great
    Miguel Cotto- actually a decent win, even though he had just been beaten to a pulp by marg but moving on
    Clottey- WHO? he threw the fight.
    Margarito- weight drained, coming off a ko loss to mosley and a long vaction from the ring
    Mosley- completely shot.
    Marquez- pac got outboxed

    you see puga_ni_nana you are a clear manny fan and are tyring to compare everything im saying to mayweathers done what for? im not talking about mayweather im talking about manny pacquiao... and his resume is full of shot old men and its the truth
     
  10. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    please rephrase, do you mean it's more favorable for hatton than marquez fighting pac at 144? if that's the case, i'm only comparing the floyd-hatton fight to pac-hatton fight which took place at 147 and 140 respectively.
     
  11. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    24
    Oct 27, 2010
    Yea I mean Hatton was more comfortable at 147 than marquez was at 144 and it's not really arguable
     
  12. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    he moved down to 140 where he is more effective looked average in the lazcano fight but still dominated him in the end. made up for that shaky performance with an empathic and dominating win over #2 ranked malignaggi while him (hatton) being the champion at the division. please note that bradley was the #3 ranked LWW at the time.

    so you are saying that when floyd beat him at 147 where he obviously struggled before was a decent win for floyd but pacquiao stopping win inside 2 rounds at 140 (his best and effective division) was not a decent yet a poor win for pacquiao?
     
  13. hatton was shot you know it.
     
  14. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    well it's arguable. marquez fought floyd, a top elite boxer and supposed to be at a catchweight of 144 where floyd did not made weight. hatton fought at 147, fought collazo, a good but not even a top 5 WW at the time and yet hatton struggled.

    and still, iw as comparing pac-hatton to pac-floyd since BUMPY KNUCKLES seems to make it that pac's hatton win is not even a joke while floyd's win over hatton was decent.
     
  15. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    so can you explain how a shot hatton dominated a top LWW in malignaggi in every round of the fight until the stoppage? well you posted in the beginning that he struggled against malignaggi so maybe you even didn't know that it actually happened.