and you believe anything that a ***** or azteca would be posting like clottey throwing the fight and/or hatton struggling against malignaggi.
like i said already if pacquiaos victory over hatton is to be reconised as so great, hatton should have killed malignaggi who is a good little boxer but is hardly a fantastic, top fighter, your gonna say but he was ranked no.2 , and like i said before that shows the division was hardly a strong one.
so by virtue of this statement, anyone who you think did not try to win the fight thew it away. so ortiz threw the fight against floyd by hugging and kissing him?
at first you said hatton struggled against malignaggi, now you think hatton should have killed maliganggi? have you even seen the fight? paulie was completely dominated and beaten.
If he "tried" to win the fight, he would have been knocked cold, Thats why he covered up,because after the first round he knew he was in for a hard evening and couldnt win. Can we stop the "Clottey threw the fight" bull**** as well. No one has EVER destroyed Mallignaggi, a prime Cotto who was a beast at 140 couldnt KO Mallignaggi. Khan stopped him in the 11th, but didnt KO him. Mallignaggi is one of the most durable hardest chins guys out there. No one,just walks through him. Hatton did how ever completely dominate him from the opening bell.
Why should he have killed Malignaggi? The guy went the full twelve with Miguel Cotto, who was a very big puncher at 140. Hatton who isn't aswell known as Cotto for his punching power smothered the guy, built up a massive lead on the scorecards and actually forced McGirt to step in and stop the fight. No one has murdered Malignaggi, not even Amir Khan who could only draw out an 11th round stoppage on a Malignaggi who has seen better days. You're underrating Malignaggi here. I don't thin there's anyone around with the offensive capability and style to "murder" Malignaggi.
Look at the whole body, genius! Common sense should tell you that some body parts of Hatton that you did not see in the stats were heavier or bigger than that of Pacquiao.
Not only did Cotto not "murder" Mallignaggi,it was actually a quite competitive fight. Wasnt as one sided as the Hatton fight
im not talking about mayweather why do u keep doing so... ODLH-severly weight drained and past his best Ricky Hatton-way past his best, at his best not even great Miguel Cotto- actually a decent win, even though he had just been beaten to a pulp by marg but moving on Clottey- WHO? he threw the fight. Margarito- weight drained, coming off a ko loss to mosley and a long vaction from the ring Mosley- completely shot. Marquez- pac got outboxed
well where was bigger then... those measurements cover all the vital areas entire upper torso waist legs, cant think of to many other areas on the human body
Look at their bodies. Hattom doesnt carry any fat in the ring, yet hes 4 pounds heavier and basically looks far more powerful. His back and shoulder look far broader and thicker. How do you explain it? Before the fight everyone was saying Pac couldnt compete with Hatton due to the size difference.
Not the most impressive because both guys had brutal KO's within their last 2 fights.. If they were prime I might agree more..
hatton would have carried fat into the ring all fighters do, i agree hatton is the bigger boned man, but you cannot claim pacquiaos victory is so great letalone the old hattons the bigger man **** when he clearly was not, an inch bigger at this chest does not change over night and neither do any of the other size advantages pacquaio had, please dont think im saying pac was a far bigger man and hatton was smal, like i said before im emphasising my point but ppl on this forum take everything u say in its gospel and arent reasonable but hey:bbb