True. But what I was referring to something a little different. Basically what I am saying is you can't say one win makes a resume greater than another especially when the other fighter has fought good opposition also. I base resume on consistency. For example. IMO I believe that Floyd has a better overall resume than Erik Morales. Yes Morales has Manny and MAB on his resume. But after that his resume is somewhat thin. If you compare their 10 best wins, Floyds resume should come out on top.
Wins arranged by deserved impact to legacy Barrera I Cotto Hatton Morales II Sasakul Ledwaba de la Hoya Mosley Morales III Barrera II Corrales Genaro Hatton Mosley de la Hoya JMM Castillo II Gatti Baldomir Manfredy Overall ranking of both their top ten fights: Barrera I, Corrales, Cotto, Genaro, Hatton (Floyd's), Hatton (Pac's), Mosley (Floyd's), Morales II, de la Hoya (Floyd's), Sasakul, JMM (Floyd's), Castillo II, Ledwaba, de la Hoya (Pac's), Mosley (Pac's), Morales III, Barrera II, Gatti, Baldomir, Manfredy
Depends on best in performance or status of the opponent. Pacquiao has the greater win performance wise combined with status with Barerra. Barerra was an ATG and top P4P fighter who just defeated Hamed and Morales and was the top guy. Corrales is Floyd's best performance and Corrales who was the best in the division but he isn't the ATG Barrera is to me. I think Corrales even gets overrated sometimes due to the Castillo fights. Floyd has a better arguement with DLH because I remember that fight was looked at as more 55 45 in Floyd's favor before it happened.
Corrales MAB MAB was the better fighter, but Floyd's performance was pure class. He thoroughly outclassed a guy who was in the same talent range easily.