Timeline of the premiere LW in the world.

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by lufcrazy, Nov 23, 2011.


  1. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,469
    Sep 7, 2008
    I thought he'd weighed in a shade over the limit. My mistake.

    As for the rankings Luf, I'd only rate fighters that were inside the divisions limit. Otherwise they're in the next division.
     
  2. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,469
    Sep 7, 2008
    In Clay Moyles book, it says that Langford weighed 136lbs on the day of the fight. Is that incorrect Senya? Admittedly still more than a lb over the limit at that time (my mistake)
     
  3. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    82,093
    22,174
    Sep 15, 2009
    Yeah i'd always heard he was just a pound over too.

    The problem with that is a common way for champs to duck an opponent was make a catchweight fight a pound over the limit. If a champ gets knocked out by a top contender in a fight set at a catchweight to prevent the title being on the line I can't allow that guy to still be my top man.

    There has to be some give for times like this in the early days imo but not too much. 137 is closer to the lw division than any other so i'm happy there.

    Look at some of the early listed champs and they were losing every other fight but kept their belt because it was one or two pounds over the limit.

    Given those circumstances would you still be staunch in the limit?
     
  4. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,469
    Sep 7, 2008
    Don't you teach maths? I'd round up meself :tong
     
  5. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    82,093
    22,174
    Sep 15, 2009
    Flea, :patsch

    To the nearest 5 137 rounds to 135. That's exactly the reason I chose that number :)

    Lw is 135, lww is 140. Anything less than 137.5 is nearer the lw limit.
     
  6. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,469
    Sep 7, 2008
    I actually have serious problems with maths, I was an English prodigy as a kid and couldn't go to school because I hampered other kids learning, although my Mum was told I was (no joke) a completely lost cause in maths.

    Mum says I'm numerically dyslexic I can't even do simple double digit sums, hurts my head and makes me sweat, no joke :-(
     
  7. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    82,093
    22,174
    Sep 15, 2009
    Put the english talent to use! Get a book written about those bloody thai boxers you keep banging on about, or make it specific about say the galaxy brothers :)

    Maths is tricky ya know it's either understanding that's inbuilt or it's done by rote.
     
  8. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,469
    Sep 7, 2008
    :-( I am writing a book about Thai boxers.
     
  9. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    82,093
    22,174
    Sep 15, 2009
    Glad I inspired you ;-)
     
  10. DonBoxer

    DonBoxer The Lion! Full Member

    8,063
    34
    Apr 28, 2010
    I see the logic of rounding down to an extent.

    That isnt how a weight class works though. Each weight class has a max limit, anything over that is in the next weight class so surely anything above today's light weight limit of 135 should not count as lightweight.
     
  11. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    82,093
    22,174
    Sep 15, 2009
    For example: lara fought williams at 155 but it counted as a lmw fight above the limit.
     
  12. Senya13

    Senya13 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,973
    2,417
    Jul 11, 2005
    Boston Journal:
    "There was some delay in the men coming on, as Langford was two pounds overweight, as the articles called for 138 pounds, but the slight difference failed to have any effect on the result and Langford is deserving of all the glory that he won."

    Pawtucket (RI) Evening Times:
    "The articles called for 138 pounds at 3 o'clock. Gans weighed a few ounces over 135, while Langford was an even 140."

    Baltimore Sun:
    "Langford a trifle over 140."
     
  13. ÉL86

    ÉL86 Member Full Member

    376
    1
    Jan 4, 2011
    Thanks for taking the time to compile that lufc! I love timelines.
     
  14. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,469
    Sep 7, 2008
    No they were small middles, especially when you consider what they wouldve weighed on fight night.
     
  15. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    The key word you're looking for is LIMIT :yep