Pac's technical flaws >>>> VIDEO<<<<

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by $uckaPunch41510, Nov 25, 2011.


  1. Phat_Ass_Dude

    Phat_Ass_Dude Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,340
    0
    Jun 29, 2011
    Do you even watch boxing? Or do you just say random **** just for the **** of it? As I posted after Marquez III: "Marquez tried to show is Bravado and Mexican Machismo in the first two fights and wanted to proved to Pacquiao that he was the Better Fighter and Better Man. But in the 3rd fight, Marquez was more patient and used something that Pacquiao NEVER had...RING IQ, And he proved to the fans and to Pacquiao that he was the BETTER BOXER.

    Both Morales and Cotto also tried to prove who was the toughest and attempted to slug it out. Do you really believe one of the Smartest most intelligent Boxers on the Planet is going to go toe-2-toe with Pacquaio?
    C'mon man...:-(
     
  2. deaman

    deaman Active Member Full Member

    1,123
    0
    Oct 9, 2009
  3. pahapoisu

    pahapoisu Superman! Full Member

    7,824
    2
    Jul 5, 2010
    Pacquiao is a beast when it comes to his offense. There is no denying that. There are only a few who might slug it out with him.
    But when you actually box him, it´s a different stroy.
     
  4. Gander Tasco

    Gander Tasco Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,438
    24
    Mar 13, 2010
    Obviously you didnt read what I wrote or you dont understand it. I said boxing alone isn't good enough to beat Pac. There a million different styles out there's , and just being defensive or counter punching isnt the answer to Pacquiao. All your video proved is that MArquz has Pacquiaos number, somethng everybody already knows by now. It has nothing to do with Floyd or how any other potential fight would go. Marquez knows Pacquiao's style, he knows his rythm, his movement and how he throws punches. Morales who beat an undeveloped Pac in the first fight, copied Marquez blueprint.


    Just saying boxing beats Pacquiao doesn't mean anything, because boxing is a general term. Be more specific . Barrera and Cotto didnt just 'slug' with Pac, they used their boxing as well, and for the most part got out-boxed. Pac is no scrub when it comes to technical fighting. The only guy who has truly ever gotten the better of him consistently in that area is Marquez, that's it. And his strategy in the 3rd fight wasn't any different then the last two. It boils down to styles , in the same way Norton gave Ali hell and Tarver gave Roy Jones problems.
     
  5. ThePunchingBag

    ThePunchingBag Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,568
    4
    Nov 27, 2010
    How could Pac's team be so stupid and put him in with the one guy who has troubled him the most in recent memory and obviously has his number, jeopardizing the biggest money-fight ever, I mean what were they thinking!?
    It's not like he would've got a shitload of respect if he beat him or that it wouldve enhanced his legacy in any way, Mayweather shut that ****-drinker out before, so what was the point?
    You build Pac up as some kind of superman who easily beats up much larger guys and then you put him in with a ****-drinking midget who beat him 2 times already?
    What kind of stupid, horrible managment is this?
    WHAT THE HELL WERE THEY THINKING!?
     
  6. Phat_Ass_Dude

    Phat_Ass_Dude Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,340
    0
    Jun 29, 2011
    This content is protected
     
  7. Don Q

    Don Q Active Member Full Member

    993
    0
    May 30, 2010
    Sorry sir, he didn't "Outbox" Cotto. He won that fight because he was the faster man, period. Just as he has won against most of his opponents. You can't simply go forward against Pac, and that's the mistake that all of his opponents except JMM and SMM have done.
     
  8. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    2
    Apr 19, 2007
  9. meloy

    meloy Member Full Member

    140
    0
    Nov 12, 2010
    even if Pacquiao has technical flaws, the most technical fighter in the world cannot beat him....

    thrice!!

    :thumbsup
     
  10. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    in a technical game.
     
  11. Gander Tasco

    Gander Tasco Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,438
    24
    Mar 13, 2010
    That's what I thought/
     
  12. Gander Tasco

    Gander Tasco Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,438
    24
    Mar 13, 2010
    He outboxed cotto plenty, i guess you don't pay attention to the details or you dont have the mind for it. He knocked Cotto down with a counter punch, nothing to do with speed. He was timing Cotto's jab all night with his left hand. Nothing to do with speed. He was moving in and out / turning Cotto and hiting him from different angles and different combinations. That's technical boxing right there. If all Pacquiao is is a brawler, then anybody with speed and talent could jump in the ring and be world champion, without having learned any of the fundamentals. Obviously that aint the case.
     
  13. punisher

    punisher Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,534
    19
    Jul 16, 2010
    Two fighters in a row have turned Pac to his right, and had him leaping horribly out of balance. The difference is Marquez made him pay. Obviously, Floyd has noticed this, and has the skill to improve upon that effort.

    Cotto, Hatton, Margarito, Clottey were not moving targets, with sharp counterpunching ability. They ALL came forward with no (or very little) effective head movement, and gave no angles.
     
  14. punisher

    punisher Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,534
    19
    Jul 16, 2010
    You are right it's being defensive AND counterpunching that he can't seem to overcome.
     
  15. Jetmax

    Jetmax Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,729
    0
    Jan 4, 2010
    That is actually a great feint, body shot.