Even the most bias and Pac-hater puts it at a draw. Funny isn't it? :smoke Imagine what his REAL unbiased scoring would have been? :smoke Maybe Pacquiao by five rounds :good What? You know what? What is he talking about? asked a befuddled Mayweather. Remember, this mother****** fought Pacquiao three f****** times! One fight was a split-decision. One fight was a draw, and I dont know what the f*** that last fight was was razor thin, it This content is protected too." http://www.examiner.com/boxing-in-l...y-bob-arum-would-push-for-pacquiao-marquez-iv
yea lol floyd ant dumb, if his fighting manny next. Then he must make Manny look like a legit threat to Mayweather.
It doesnt give us more reason. All 3 of those fights were close that its never been a clear cut winner. So what can part 4 be any different? It's a waste of time in which Mayweather vs Pacquiao should be next bottom line.
Floyd was on holiday but keeping in shape while Manny was fighting the best and wearing his body out. No one gives a **** now if Floyd beats Manny now. The fight should have been made years ago.
Not really. If you are a real boxing fan, you would salivate at every moment of an evenly matched fight :smoke If others think Marquez won, then it's proper for another get-go :smoke
Roger literally speaks before he thinks. And the "why would he admit his future opponent lost?" is a completely legitimate and the most logical argument. Stupid TS is dismissing it as ***** talk without providing an alternative argument. True hallmark of an idiot.
From the very same article: "Roger said of Pacquiao. He cant fight anyways. Whats he going to do with my nephew? This content is protected Whats he going to do with my nephew? Poor Pathetic *******s!
I do think JMM won that fight, but I still wanna see Manny Vs. Floyd. altho I think Floyd schools him, anything can happen. This is BOXING, 1 punch changes ever thing.