OK, so last night, to my knowledge, was the first time Broner has appeared on UK TV, so I was intrigued after hearing all this G talk. And while I was impressed with his Mayweather-light performance against, admittedly, weak opposition, I would hardly say he is a G. Did you see him crying like a homo after the fight FFS? I mean, it wasn't the "Whaaa whaaa Waa" level of Dirrell but it was still pretty pathetic. Calm down pal, you only won the vacant WBO belt against some Argie I never heard of. It's not exactly the Thrilla in Manilla (where neither of the fighters started blubbing BTW). It's clear Broner is not a G. ESB had it totally wrong.
Broner a G. Did you see Floyd win he won his first title? [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nw1umvAE5ic&feature=related[/ame]
Spoken by someone whos probably never achieved a dream in his life, trying to talk about someone who actually won a title on national tv as he sealed a life long dream in a sport you type about and watch from your couch
Lol Mayweather is a an EXTRA G, that was like his 18th fight or something... and against a great champion, in Hernandez, and he looked spectacular and not sloppy at all.
My personal circumstances are irrelevant... a true G would not start blubbing on national TV. It's that simple.