are you serious? crolla wouldnt get past burns jab and to be honest i thought crolla and limond was a poor fight . I thought crolla fought the way all gallagher fighters fight, high gaurd walking forward it was like watching a poor mans john murray. burns would be too strong, too fast and have too much skill for him. I think that win against limond flattered team crolla . Limond hadnt fought in awhile and just looked like an old man in there and if team crolla think that that win deserves a shot for the world title then they can think again . crolla vs rees is all about he deserves:nono
Crolla isn't any where near ready for Burns. But good way to build up a big summer bout against Mitchell.
if its in the Daylate Record you can guarantee its shite, if it was written by Hugh Keevins I can vouch its bull****. W@rren was on box nation last night talking Burns-Mitchell, that fight is more credible than Crolla
Burns is fighting early March according to Frank. Could be against Crolla because Mitchell is due to have a 10 rounder in february/march.
Great. Another ****, below par, cheap to make Ricky Burns title defense. What a load of bollocks if this is true.
I wouldnt mind seeing the fight at all! Crolla is probably the most improved british boxer around. Personally i think he needs 2-3 more fights at decent european standard before world honours, but he certainly wouldnt be a pushover. I would prefer Mitchell, but this is far from Laryea level