Based on each fighter's last 2 bouts...which fighter looked better? We all know who looked better. The bible of boxing is the only reason that Pacquiao is still considered P4P #1. Everyone else has come to their senses. Floyd is the P4P king even if the ring magazine doesn't credit him for it. Floyd shouldn't be the P4P king, he IS the P4P king. If people think Manny is the king, we all can settle this issue on May 5th in Vegas.
Is this the same as People were considering Pac as P4P #1 when he destroyed the likes of Morales, Barrera etc. at the lower weights?
If you referring to the Ring P4P, it is based on accomplishments, not H2H. Floyd has not accomplished enough to surpass Pac. A controversial win against Ortiz doesn't cut it.
The triangle theory has never worked in boxing, styles make fights. Certain stlyes are poison for some guys but are easy for others. I'm sure *******s could come up with other shared opponents who Pacquiao has done better against & *****s could make their own counter argument as to why Floyd is better. That scenario is pretty much the last 2 years or so of any boxing forum lol. Or a better (and shorter) answer would be that #1 & #2 need to ****ing fight for us to really know either way.:bbb