Mayweather is the LINEAR Welterweight champion

I agree with this.

Is it Linear, or Lineal? :huh

 

*lose

 

:good

 

:roll: You guys still trying to act as if some message boarders opinion fits the gap his retirement made? atsch

 

Meh sammy serrano was the lineal and wba superfeatherweight champ whilst alexis arguello was the wbc champ.

Which man was held in higher esteem?

The man makes the belt and not the other way round.

 

he is right actually-IT WOULD BE 100 PERCENT ACCURATE HAD FLOYD NEVER RETIRED-

Pac never won the Lineal title-

THE LAST MAN TO WIN THE LINEAL TITLE WAS FLOYD OFF OF BALDOMIR-(W/OUT POLITICS INVOLVED)

 

:deal Exactly! In today's boxing, there is not version of a belt or title that actually means more then the others. Linear, WBA, WBC, Ring, WBO.... all depends on WHO hold what.

To this day, most Floyd fanboys on the site held Baldomir higher then Margarito...because he was linear. :roll:

 

Floyd retired ending his reign with the lineage but then Mosley got it after beating Margarito who Floyd beat

if Pacman got to mosley first id say he has the lineage

 

i get what your saying but Serrano was nowhere near Arguello

Floyd and Manny are on even terms

you could argue who has more clout and more esteem in the division

 

THIS IS NOT EVEN PART OF THE DEBATE-:deal

TS is just stating that he IS/WAS the last lineal champ:deal..period-

 

fuk cares if its lineal, fight the best bitches.

 

yup tell manny sign the contract Floyd ready

 

Exactly my friend, that's the point: you could argue who has more esteem.

Linearity is overstated. I know for a fact that shannon briggs was never ever the best hw in the world.

 

There is no debate. The ts gave his opinion about who the lineal champ was, I gave my opinion about the worth of being a lineal champ.