David Haye "I don't deserve 50:50 against Vitali"

What did Adamek, Solis, Briggs, Sosnowski, Arreola, etc do to get a crack? Were you asking then?

 

Cant make sentences so ill throw some words at you instead.

Reasons:

Power, speed, handsomeness, marketability, melanin, excitement, English, slickness, fights through injury, combinations.


I could do this all day but my rudimentary English wouldn't do the guy justice.

 

You could have left the others out and the evidence would still have been irrefutable. That is all.

 

Yeah, just in your own little black & slick world but not in reality, there he was a normal CW Champ and the WBA Paper HW Champ :thumbsup

 

lolz u mad.

 

Dont forget blackness :deal

 

nah i secretly added it, see "Melanin".

Thought that was pretty damn slick.

 

Haye and Special K have the best of both worlds by being half black and half white

 

:rofl:rofl:rofl

 

2 weight champion on a good run beating Golota, Arreola and Grant along the way.

Earned his shot by working his way up to mandatory position, not to mention that Solis is one of the best AM stars the sport has ever seen.

Replacements after others pulled out or didn't want the fight.

Arreola? Nothing, an American hyped padded record overrated fighter.

 

haye= slick + black

Klitschko+ white and cack

 

"I don't deserve 50:50 against Vitali"

Can't argue against that kind of slickness. Haye is right as rain.

 

Why? Were people willing to pay to see him alone? I thought people were only willing to pay to see him fight the true Champion...............

I swear, everytime I think the ignorant folks have left these boards I see an old fool say something like that.

 

Come on RUSKULL, take your head out if your arse thats such a ridiculous argument. 50:50 was fair.

Pacquiao is 100x the name Wlad is, he's a global superstar. He fought a British fighter and got 50% of the Sky PPV money.

May weather was the regarded as one of the biggest stars in the sport and the best fighter in the world. He got 0% of the Sky PPV deal when he fought a British fighter.

Far more famous fighters have got no more than 50% of sky PPV against British fighters. Why does Wlad warrant a better deal than Pacquiao or Mayweather? Those two are icons of the sport.

The only reason Wlad was on PPV and had that chance to earn that money was because he was fighting David Haye. As appalling as it is, Haye could get on PPV and make multi-millions fighting Audley ****ing Harrison. His previous two fights had both been on PPV, Wlad was not required for him to do that.

However, unlike Haye's previous opponents Wlad was the man at the weight, so he got 50% - which is what he asked for. Yet you fans seem to think he deserved more than even his own promotional company was happy with.

50:50 is a perfectly fair deal - anyone who argues against it either way has some homo-fuelled agenda

 

That's because Mayweather got 100% of the US TV money (HBO License fee) and 100% of all the non UK money around the world. He made more than Hatton did because of this. You are a failure. :roflatsch