Should PEDs be legal for boxers?

Ironic, considering that you obviously didn't carefully read my response.

 

If they have qualifications and are able to give themselves the drugs then that's a different question. However, a rule which allows fighters to use PEDs would be abused.

 

But what about boxers who refuse to take PED's? And wouldn't a fighter who used PED's repeatedly in most of his fights become some kind of boxing pariah? Wouldn't all his accomplishments be not worth anything seeing that he used means others than his own to achieve what he has? Allowing PEDS would make boxing a big joke. We would have Brock Lesnars and John Cenas running around in no time.

 

Should boxers be allowed to use an axe if both agree?

 

Athletes have been taking ped's for decades mate

2011 is no different

 

You can hurl all the insults you want. That won't change the fact that you're asking an idiotic question. You talk down to everyone as if you're so smart, yet you're not smart enough to realize why your question is ridiculous. People have even pointed it out to you, and your response is to question their intelligence. That's a **** poor way to debate.

 

Gotta like Luke but he just got fukin owned with this post:deal

 

You can't allow one person to be murdered for entertainment reasons, even if they agree to exceptional rules, which is why PEDs should always be banned.

 

much different story WITH MEDICAL MARIJUANA-

your talking about "Sanctioned Violence" when u talk about 2 men being able to use PED's..IN SANCTIONED VIOLENCE (KEYWORD-SANCTIONED) THERE IS NO ROOM FOR PED'S-0-NONE

FOR THE GUYS WHO WANT TO DO PED'S THEY CAN GO TO SOUTH SAN DIEGO, PARTS IN L.A, AND DOWN TO TIJUANA-There are plenty of underground fights going on where they can make money, have a crowd cheer for em, take ped's w/out any penalties, fight in weight classed divisions or freestyle where weight does not matter-

What your talking about already existsin UNSANCTIONED VIOLENCE-BOXING IS "SANCTIONED":deal