Froch: "Dirrell isn't manly"

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Jack, Dec 4, 2011.


  1. Joe_MacKenzie

    Joe_MacKenzie Boxing Addict banned

    4,187
    0
    Nov 7, 2011
    For once I agree with Jack. :good
     
  2. AnotherFan

    AnotherFan Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,221
    2
    Dec 20, 2010
    Makes me think about Virgil Hunters quote about those headbutts in Wards fight against Kessler. ****ing hilarios :lol:

    It is questionable if Dirrell will be able to manage his career well enough to make use of that potential, though. Breaking the contract with the super 6 tournament was not a very good way to marqueting himself.
     
  3. AnotherFan

    AnotherFan Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,221
    2
    Dec 20, 2010
    Sums it up real well, I think.
     
  4. I was rooting for Froch but he lost to Dirrell, it was a robbery. I can't actually remember Froch winning any rounds clearly, but Dirrell had him hurt in the 10th. Froch looked awful in that fight, and there's been a lot of revisionism since then.
     
  5. HeavyT

    HeavyT Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,709
    19
    Feb 9, 2009
    settle down wicky. its also not a street fight.
     
  6. Loggo

    Loggo Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,029
    2
    Mar 26, 2006
    Some of them exchanges where Froch hit him round the back of his head was because Dirrel was bending down and falling.You can`t do that **** when facing your opponent.
     
  7. conraddobler

    conraddobler Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,853
    148
    Mar 7, 2010
    poor Froch. It's hard to pull off staggering backwards with spaghetti legs while being measured up and punched in the face in a manly way. Being put on ***** street before one's wife and home fans just doesn't look good. Call it bad optics.

    Incidentally, Britards flock to Dirrell threads like a pack of buzzards. Not manly to be obsessed with with Dirrell in this way. It makes one wonder.
     
  8. MichiganWarrior

    MichiganWarrior Still Slick! Still Black! Full Member

    26,793
    7
    Mar 20, 2010

    Well you have to remember it was similar to the threads before Ward vs Kessler. Froch was going to blow Dirrell out of the water. Dirrell had no chance. ect ect.


    The Brits know who really won that night.
     
  9. conraddobler

    conraddobler Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,853
    148
    Mar 7, 2010

    rabbit punches are the last refuge of an unmanly coward. Period.
     
  10. conraddobler

    conraddobler Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,853
    148
    Mar 7, 2010
    The poor Brits!
     
  11. Big Left

    Big Left Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,243
    20
    Dec 12, 2009
    no, turning your back on your oppenent so he does not hit you is. And Dirrell did that a couple of times, along with ducking below the belt line.
     
  12. Reppin501

    Reppin501 The People's Champ Full Member

    21,943
    3,300
    Apr 26, 2010
    So if AA and Froch can't "shatter his glass jaw" who will? Stupid ass post.
     
  13. irishny

    irishny Obsessed with Boxing banned

    15,119
    10
    May 8, 2009
    Well if hes not manly, then Froch is basically admitting he giot beaten by an unmanly man.

    If the fight was anywhere else, Dirrell takes that fight by 2-3 rounds
     
  14. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    23
    Jul 28, 2008
    would love to see where someone wins by landing 105 punches over 12 rounds as a challenger
     
  15. Squire

    Squire Let's Go Champ Full Member

    9,120
    4
    Jun 22, 2009
    Everything Froch says are the words of a G