David Haye is SIGNIFICANTLY better than Povetkin, Adamek, Ibragimov, Solis & Helenius

fragomeni never hurt him

plus his i-talian.

 

Adamek was a top class opponent but alas, he got crushed by a Klitschko so now apparently must have been a terrible boxer all along. 7 World title fight victories plus easy wins over Golota, Grant and Arreola count for nothing now.......

For the record I gave him a strong chance of beating Vitali, somewhere around 30%.

 

ofcourse he hurt him..and just because he likes pasta dosnt mean anything

was he bald tho??

 

indeed.but you didnt single me out with a post and be very agressive in telling me i hadnt a clue and that i would be very surprised when i seen the score cards in such a lopsided ud..

 

I don`t know where these fuzzy feelings for Haye are coming from. The Vit that fought Adamek, has Haye on the canvas in less than 5, especially if Haye tries to engage. Haye had the benefit of fighting a less agressive brother, who simply doesn`t throw as much heavy leather in the early rounds. Secondly, Haye was much more evasive and negative than Adamek. People love to say Haye had great defence, but all I saw was running and lunging in (and down) on occasion. Many people, including Steward agreed on that point. Adamek tried (and failed), Haye didn`t even try to win. He tried to survive.

 

It's quite easy to see how Vitali vs Haye would go, style wise this wont be an unusual fight for Vitali. He has all the sparring you could ever ask for for this type of fight. Hide, Adamek, Solis, Kingpin and Byrd. Not to mention Vitali dominated all of the above with only Byrd giving him trouble while injured.

Haye's preparation would then lay in the Valuev and Wlad fight where he has struggled badly against Valuev while winning by the skin of his teeth and of course losing every round against Wlad in a one sided beat down.

 

To bad Haye can't and won't prove that statement.

 

Your thread history is disgusting. I'm not even talking about your weekly Hopkins/Calzaghe thread but VIRTUALLY EVER THREAD YOU CREATE has a racist undertone. I didn't even need to go past page 1 in your thread history to prove my point.

I don't see a single thread that remotely favours coloured fighters. Might be coincidence - unless one decideds to enter one of your shitfest threads.

In your pathetic and unfunny

This content is protected

you're enraged that black fighters are overpresent in ATG rankings. Furthermore, you complain about black fighters who are

This content is protected

according to you.

Other than that it's 90% Klit threads which have solely the purpose to prove the Klits are better than our chilhood heroes because you successfully calculated that in Microsoft Excel. You should quit watching boxing. I'd be for the better.

By the way, I'm a Klitschko supporter (I was ringside vs. Chambers and Haye) but in no way am I in the same boat as the white supremacists who are omnipresent on here.

 

Me too.

Haye is off balance, has a low output and his technical ability is nearly zero.

He's got good hand speed, head movement and a heavy overhand right. That's it.

You need more than that to be a real World Champion.

 

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8X_Ot0k4XJc[/ame]

 

is that not Rogan's hand? :nut

 

Adameks performance against mcbride and vitali were disgusting he should be put down for it.

 

Has there ever been a more pathetic heavyweight resume in the history of boxing? :-(

 

Conveniently, Haye put himself down against Wlad.

 

hate for haye leads people to put him below others...when people don't actually consider that the others have done even less than they think haye has has done.