Better win: James Kirkland or Lamont Peterson?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Flo_Raiden, Dec 10, 2011.


  1. Flo_Raiden

    Flo_Raiden Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,813
    34,957
    Oct 12, 2010
    Guys like Kirkland and Peterson are examples of everything that is right with boxing. You had both fighters who needed to something to prove and were the big underdogs. Kirkland, who recently got out of jail and was KO'd shockingly a few fights earlier, managed to whip Angulo in his hometown. Peterson, who had a rough life with his brother over the years, managed to overcome Khan with the hometown crowd by his side.
    Who do you think had the better "feel-good" win?
     
  2. Colpolite

    Colpolite Guest

    Peterson because Angulo ain't nothing but a bum. Angulo is not even a world champion and he got beat by a weak minded Cintron.
     
  3. tito44

    tito44 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,585
    6
    Oct 25, 2009
    Peterson was gifted a win, clearly even though he fought well. Kirklands was much more impressive and was a ko.
     
  4. Flo_Raiden

    Flo_Raiden Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,813
    34,957
    Oct 12, 2010
    Still love both fights with the underdogs winning. Kirkland looked more impressive beating Angulo one-sidedly, while Peterson holds the better win against a top fighter.
     
  5. PinoyProdigy

    PinoyProdigy Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    29,850
    14,075
    Jul 30, 2011
    Peterson. Khan>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Angulo
     
  6. SweetHome_Bama

    SweetHome_Bama Loyal Member banned

    32,270
    3
    Apr 30, 2010
    Peterson was the better win simply because he won a title. Kirkland would have been great if the WBC didn't change the fight from a mandatory eliminator to a quarter final eliminator after Kirkland destroyed the potential Mexico vs Mexico fight of Angulo-Canelo
     
  7. slugger3000

    slugger3000 You Mad Bro? Full Member

    32,620
    3
    Jul 19, 2010
    Kirkland going to Mexico and Knocking out Angulo of course.. That was BAD ASS! Peterson didnt even win, BS decision!
     
  8. slugger3000

    slugger3000 You Mad Bro? Full Member

    32,620
    3
    Jul 19, 2010
    :deal
     
  9. Manfred

    Manfred Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,210
    5,428
    May 22, 2011
    The stakes in the Peterson fight was considerbly higher but Kirklands win was more macho.
     
  10. paulfv

    paulfv Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,853
    1
    Jul 7, 2007
    Kirkland.

    Kirkland beat the hell out of Angulo, who had even more mystique than Khan did.

    Props to both men, though. HUGE wins, and wins that made Golden Boy sad. :?

    :lol:
     
  11. Bad Boyz

    Bad Boyz Sportscenter Full Member

    2,518
    1
    Aug 30, 2011
    Kirkland of course. Peterson didn't win the fight.
     
  12. flem1

    flem1 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,934
    75
    Mar 18, 2006
    Peterson. He beat the #2 JWW and won a belt.
     
  13. The Spider

    The Spider Guest

    Lamont Peterson's was a great win. I don't have any time for James Kirkland.
     
  14. turbina

    turbina Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,783
    7
    Apr 17, 2008
    Peterson.

    By far.

    Kirkland got lucky that Angulo is a dumbass and completely gassed himself out more then anything, and that's what he has to thank for his easy victory... although not so easy since he was on the deck in the first round.

    Peterson took it to Khan for 12 long rounds in a great fight and fairly got the nod.
     
  15. janeschicken

    janeschicken hard work! deadicayshin! Full Member

    20,570
    19
    Nov 10, 2007
    Kirkland and it's not even close. Decisive, and in the other guy's back yard.