That's it! "Ward declining to meet Bute" -- BUTE VS FROCH IS ON!!!!!!!!!!!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by drozzy, Dec 18, 2011.


  1. Orbete

    Orbete Active Member Full Member

    1,358
    0
    Jun 9, 2010
    Once again, what you've just said makes perfect sense to me.
    You offer valid explanations for Ward's behaviour. I'm pretty sure that's what happened.

    However, that still doesn't change the fact that Ward lacked class with that particular afirmation and that people on the forums that shout: "Yeah baby, Ward said it like it is!!!" look like cave-men.

    It's not like Bute was drinking whisky in some glamorous Casions while Ward was training for his fights. He worked just as hard this whole time. They made the same sacrifices and effort. Of course Ward has faced two better opponets than what Bute faced. That was Ward's merit but not Bute's fault either. Once again: there is no proof that Ward worked harder than Bute. It's skills that got Ward where he is, not training. Don't get me wrong, he couldn't have beaten Froch without preparation but that wasn't the decisive factor. It's not like Froch trained less than Ward.

    Finally, make no mistake: you aren't merly saying what others were saying here, on ESB. There were many that emhasized the fact that Bute doesn't deserve to face Ward, fueled by their hero own allegation. That reason only is enough for Ward to be more responsible in the future when he is interviewed, no matter the pressure.

    I agree with the fact that Ward is the best SMW in the world based on achievements.
    WTF is so hard for the others to admit that what Ward said about Bute is pure bull**** (that Bute doesn't "deserve" to face him)?
     
  2. Orbete

    Orbete Active Member Full Member

    1,358
    0
    Jun 9, 2010
    Did you just lost an avatar bet? I can not imagine someone willingly holding that avatar in the next coulple of.... years.
     
  3. BunnyGibbons

    BunnyGibbons Is Not About That Life Full Member

    6
    6
    Jun 9, 2010
    :lol: It's badass, man. I still stand by the sentiment.

    Don't worry, I'll be changing it to "Bute is a disease."
     
  4. laffie

    laffie Montreal Full Member

    12,846
    1
    Jan 5, 2008
    Well, now I know you. you're a ****. :lol:
     
  5. laffie

    laffie Montreal Full Member

    12,846
    1
    Jan 5, 2008
    Can't you read? I'm not butt hurt, I'm yawning. Don't you know what it means?
     
  6. TitoMahawk

    TitoMahawk Retarded trolls detector Full Member

    2,381
    0
    Jul 12, 2011

    yawning isn't exactly the same as being butt hurt...

    The guy he quoted was just repeating a familiar trolling post...

    Hence the "yawn"
     
  7. shaunster101

    shaunster101 Yido Full Member

    24,013
    16
    Nov 29, 2007
    yes - but you're not actually yawning are you, it's a figure of speech to indicate you're bored/fed up with what he's saying.

    You replied and said you was yawning to express your disdain for what he said, because he was saying something you didn't like about your favourite fighter.
     
  8. TitoMahawk

    TitoMahawk Retarded trolls detector Full Member

    2,381
    0
    Jul 12, 2011

    After a while, trolling just makes you yawn...yeah we know it is just a figure of speech...that means you are bored.


    Of course there is no way to really know if the guy is really bored or butt hurt....

    In my country: "innocent until proven guilty" :D
     
  9. shaunster101

    shaunster101 Yido Full Member

    24,013
    16
    Nov 29, 2007
    :lol: I know, i'm just stirring some ****. Never had much exposure to Bute fans before!

    I want to see Ward - Bute, but I also understand why i might be best for Bute for fight a Froch or Kessler first.
     
  10. TMH

    TMH Active Member Full Member

    802
    11
    Jan 12, 2010
    Stop your squabbling everyone. This is awesome news; win-win for everyone. A lot of people were saying Froch-Bute was FOTY candidate from the start, and we've got two of them made now.
     
  11. TitoMahawk

    TitoMahawk Retarded trolls detector Full Member

    2,381
    0
    Jul 12, 2011

    :lol: at the exposure


    In any case, A Froch fight would be more entertaining for sure.
     
  12. TMH

    TMH Active Member Full Member

    802
    11
    Jan 12, 2010
    True. Excellent poster. You have to admit all of the "Rikki-Tikki-Tavvi" and "Has the Cobra in the bag." remarks were great. :lol:
     
  13. Badlok

    Badlok Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,616
    0
    Nov 15, 2008
    exactly!
     
  14. drozzy

    drozzy AERE Full Member

    12,271
    29
    Nov 2, 2010
    Ward - sure there's a decent chance he wins a comfortable UD. Froch - I don't see it.

    Months? Mid-April to mid-July on EX at USMCS Yuma, vacation until early August, move to the Barrie area mid-August, back early September.

    Sportsleader wrote on my board and gave me **** for that, you can see I replied. :lol:

    That's right, I mysteriously.. disappear. :skull


    I don't how profitable a rematch in Nottingham would be if Froch were to get stopped in Montreal. And come to think of it, the same applies the other way around (of the stoppage). :D
     
  15. BunnyGibbons

    BunnyGibbons Is Not About That Life Full Member

    6
    6
    Jun 9, 2010
    How was I trolling? The balding Romany Canuck comment touch a nerve? It's my stated opinion that Froch beats Bute. And why should Bute get the home fight first? When he gets beat, he'll be disinclined to come to England for a second whupping...& Froch will lose out on the payday, coz that's the only reason he's in this game, according to the Bute Boys: money. :-(