Ward is better than Calzaghe, would beat Calzaghe, and will soon be the #1 SMW ever.

Popkins embarrassing himself once again when it comes to legend sir joe!!

46-0 there is no blueprint baby!!

 

Lighten up you tranny cum guzzling, insecure dip****.

:smoke

 

:roll: I'd never lose anything boxing-related to a child like you. I don't start countless shitty pointless threads like you do, but you knew that, didn't you, which is why you threw down a completely fake challenge, you biscuit arsed cum eater.

You've been Team Elite's whipping boy for months at a time, losing debates over and over. Are you not even man enough to admit it, DIMINATA?

Also, your mother gives blowjobs to glass-jawed arm-punching mma fighters.

:hi::finger5

 

I can't knock those that favor Joe over Ward but this particular post speaks volumes about how biased a fan can be. To even think for one second Ward cannot or will not surpass Joe is compeletly ludicrous. I truly believe Joe's fans have lead me to this added dislike for such an accomplished fighter. Eubank & RJJ where completely past it his win against hopkins was ugly though he should excellent conditioning....I'm just in awe at the posts I read regarding Joe they are insanely biased.

 

CartoonCaper, you are showing how delusional you are. Here is a previous post, please read dummy

Originally Posted by bailey

This content is protected

I will be honest and admit I havent read all of your post, but how can you call Kessler and Froch prime.
Kessler was an unwell double vision suffering fighter.
Froch was 34 was 5-1 in world title fights and struggled with an old glorified journeyman in G Johnson who couldnt compete at SMW previously. YOU think Froch was lucky against Dirrell and Froch was behind against 1-2 in his last 3 fights Taylor before a late KO.

Yet you say Calzaghes win over 31 year old Eubank was a shot Eubank, when in Frochs last fight he fought to a MDec against old Johnson.

Here is an old post I think we debated on
So many people rate Wards win over Kessler as something special yet dont rate Calzaghes victory over Eubank. Why?

It was Wards 21st fight, Ward was 25
It was Calzaghes 23rd fight, Calzaghe was 25

Ward won at home
Calzaghe won away

When Ward beat Kessler, Kessler was 42-1-0
When Calzaghe beat Eubank, Eubank was 45-2-2

Kessler was 31
Eubank was 31

Kessler was 8-1 in world title fights
Eubank was 17-2-2 in world title fights

It was just under 3 years since Kessler beat a world rated opponent
It was just under 3 years since Eubank beat a world rated opponent

Kessler had only fought 3 completed rounds in 1 fight in a year before fighting Ward
Eubank had only fought 7 completed rounds in 2 fights in a year before fighting Calzaghe

Kesslers only loss was clear
Eubanks 2 losses - first was very close (debateable) the second was a SD, to the same fighter.

Kessler was favourite to win.
100 years of Boxing News claims Calzaghe was underdog, I have read Calzaghe was underdog but some posters claim he was betting favourite, though.

This content is protected

Notes Eubank was a strong favourite, but dont know where the site got its info.

Both Ward and Calzaghe had dominant performances with Calzaghe scoring 2 KDs.

After the loss Kessler beat undefeated WBC champ Froch
After the loss Eubank fought WBO CW champ Thompson and lost a close decision scoring a KD. Eubank fought a return with the bigger Thompson and lost on injury when ahead. Thompson was a CW and the only fighter to have beaten D Haye.

I have read how people on ESB say Eubank was shot so -
How far past prime was Eubank to you then?
Eubank had lost a close decision to Collins, that many thought he won, had a couple of tune ups and rematched Collins to a SD, had a couple of tune ups and lost clearly to underdog Calzaghe. After that loss Eubank went up to CW and challenged world champ Thompson losing a very close decision and then rematched Thompson losing on injury when ahead. Thats Thompson who years later past his best KOd D Haye.
Consider Eubank only had 2 losses to one fighter when he fought Calzaghe, the second by SD to a world champ and was 31 then went on to challenge a big CW flooring him etc, how past his prime do YOU think he was?
Remember Kessler is Wards big win and was the same age as Eubank here and had around the same amount of fights, so is Kessler shot as well, because Kessler has a serious eye problems and was an unwell double vision suffering fighter who has been inactive for a while now due to his injury


Remember when you make silly comments about losses was G Johnson considered past his prime when years ago after losing to Hopkins he went 7-9-2 including the Hopkins loss

 

Beouche hasnt embarressed himself at all. Beouche stated a fact.
The only Troll on here is the pissy little poster whos known as Popkins, trying to get some attention.
Feel better now treacle :smooch

 

Popkins officially Team Elites whipping boy

 

Its not the first time and wont be the last time Popkins shames himself on here

 

so IF (for the sake of argument) he fights Bute, and bute wins, does that mean bute is the best smw ever?! using your logic the answer woudl be yes?

i'm not "hating" or anything, jsut curious. you can see how that would apply...