Who was more shot Froch vs Ward or Eubank vs Calzaghe

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Auracle21, Dec 21, 2011.


  1. Auracle21

    Auracle21 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,998
    5
    Jan 13, 2008
  2. Auracle21

    Auracle21 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,998
    5
    Jan 13, 2008
    easily eubank. Froch isnt shot.
     
  3. skellington

    skellington Bogbrush Full Member

    1,601
    0
    Aug 3, 2007
    Eubank was also severely depleted from making weight.
     
  4. JASPER

    JASPER Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,214
    8
    Jul 21, 2007

    SSSSSSSSHHHHHH! be quiet the Calslappy nutlickers might hear ya and they tend to run in packs!:nono
     
  5. Boro chris

    Boro chris Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,276
    21
    Mar 14, 2005
  6. dwighttsharpe

    dwighttsharpe Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,306
    1
    Jan 31, 2009
    Froch is not shot. Froch is Froch. Slow.

    Ward just too quick for stiff Froch.
     
  7. AnotherFan

    AnotherFan Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,221
    2
    Dec 20, 2010
    Wardos can be a bit touchy, at times.

    I'll bumb this thread for you mate. Hopefully there are some ESB-members inclined to show you some support.
     
  8. jeffjoiner

    jeffjoiner Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,183
    5
    Jun 22, 2008
    One could make a legitimate argument that the Froch who lost on Saturday would have been Slappy Joe's best win (assuming Slappy had beaten him). He's younger than both Hopkins and Jones and is a more complete fighter than Lacy and Manfredo.
     
  9. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004

    I agree. The OP doesn't even make an attempt to say WHY or anything. Just their age.... That's ESB for ya.
     
  10. des3995

    des3995 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,903
    126
    Oct 23, 2009
    Mods, please combine the 2 threads.
     
  11. Popshots

    Popshots Active Member Full Member

    1,458
    1
    Jan 4, 2005
    You seem to be biased yourself to suggest that Froch is "shot". You are no better than a "Calzaghe nuthugger" because you are taking away from Ward's victory. Could it be that Ward is just that good to make Froch look "shot"?
     
  12. Auracle21

    Auracle21 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,998
    5
    Jan 13, 2008
    LoL what the hell are you talking about? I am making this thread making fun of the idea that Froch is shot. He is stillin his prime and can still beat the best out there sans Ward. Its a joke to compare a shot Eubank to a prime Froch in the two fights.
     
  13. watcher

    watcher Active Member Full Member

    528
    0
    Apr 26, 2006
    Wait. Was he drained, or shot?

    Oh I get it, he was paraplegic! :patsch
     
  14. Auracle21

    Auracle21 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,998
    5
    Jan 13, 2008
  15. Auracle21

    Auracle21 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,998
    5
    Jan 13, 2008
    funny how people thought froch was shot(or has ever even shown signs of slowing down).