Readers vote Pacquiao-Marquez III the "Robbery of the Year" for 2011

definitely not a robbery and definitely n ot the worst. I would say CHisora -Helenius was the worst. Lara-Williams was a close second. Pac-Marquez wasnt even close to those two.

 

It wasn't the robbery of the year. It wasn't even a robbery. However, JMM - close but clear.


I'd have it a tie between Chisora/Helenius and Lara/Williams. And it definitely wasn't Khan/Peterson either.! Has that fool stopped whining about it yet?

 

I had JMM by SD you ****ing clueless IDIOT!

 

I bet a bulk of those votes are bandwagon *******s. Another bulk are Mexicans. Another bulk are *****s.

 

It was a clear as day robbery and people that scored it for Pac should just giveup watching boxing all together because you clearly score fights on ineffective aggression which is not 1 of the 4 MAIN CRITERIA to score a fight.

Only correct way to score that fight was 116 - 112 for Marquez, 115 - 113 if you wanted to be highly generous to Pac.

As Arum told Marquez after "It was a business decision" Marquez could have scored 3 knock downs and dominated every round and he would still lose to salvage the Mayweather fight.

Much like Sturm was NEVER going to win vs Oscar to salvage the Hopkins fight.

Over 80% of the community/experts/boxers/unofficial judges scored this for Marquez, and with the remaining 20% the largest portion had it a draw, almost noone scored this for Pac.

No matter if the official records will show this as a win for Pac the public outcry will always make sure this fight is rememberd as a win for Marquez.

(also Pac saying after the fight saying he CLEARLY won means hes got the braincells of a dodo)

 

So which side of your brain had it for Pacquiao? :rofl atsch

 

good:happy

 

:dead

 

That's how I had it. But that's also why I don't call it a robbery. I'm not sure a fight with 2 rounds in it can be called a robbery. But yeah, JMM clearly won it.

 

Anytime a fight is DEAD EASY to score even if its close its a robbery if the wrong fighter gets the decision.
This fight however was not really close, you had to be EXTREMELY generous to still have Pac losing by a round ... how on earth you can budge another 2 points in favour of Pac just means you have brain damage or paid by Arum.

*edit i watched this fight several times now and i predicted Pac to win and win big... but even when i TRY VERY HARD to score everything close to Pac i comeup with 115 - 113 Marquez... 114 - 114 if i start ignoring Marquez clean punching and reward Pac just flailing into air and gloves. (i feel extremely ******ed doing this)

In the end fights are scored on 4 points .... Clean Punching, EFFECTIVE Aggression, Ring Generalship and Defense.... can anyone honestly claim Pac won in even 1 of these catagories?

Marquez landed all the clean punches, his aggression was always effective, he controlled the fight and the pace and he dodged/slipped and blocked the most punches.

 

looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooool

 

Yes they have..Yes they have. Pacquiao sux!

 

Yea, ****in Mexicans... :roll: Dumbass

 

stop it already please.. no more crying.. just accept that pacquiao won..