Readers vote Pacquiao-Marquez III the "Robbery of the Year" for 2011

****ing ownage:rofl:rofl

 

JMM and his fans = :crying

 

This content is protected

 

JMM Fans ----------> ssssstttttoooooopppppp iiiiittttt aaaallllrrreeeaaddyyy.. pls?

 

The problem with that though is that almost every fight in history with a two round difference can be swayed either way.

Judging should be more definitive and judges should be on the same page with each other much more often, and that's not just about this fight, but the sport in general.

 

:good :yep

Hmm lets see..The vast majority of the boxing media, experts, trainers, and professional boxers...or stupid *******s who dont know **** about boxing in denial???

 

Marquez won and it wasn't that close. Clearly schooled Pac. Awesome performance from JMM, I have him 2-1-0 against Pac and most people known Marquez really won at least 2 of the fights. His style is all wrong for Pac, and hes a hard *******. Im a fan of Manny, but he lost that fight and Floyd will probably stop him late

 

Accepting a robbery is the last thing people should do or they will continue on happening.
Pac lost deal with it.

 

if marquez was more aggressive and won the rounds decisively. imo, marquez fought more actively in the 2nd fight than this one. not even close to a robbery.

 

Good thing there are judges, because Marquez was eating right hands all night.

This content is protected

 

not that i dont agree that it was a bad decision, but, helenius-chisora was a lot worst.

 

******* alert!


Handful of pictures proves a winner of a 12 round fight?

Don't think so!

 

I agree, the disparity in judges' cards at times is mind boggling, but as you say, that's universal. It's a serious flaw in boxing.

What was your score for the fight?

 

You're a ******* your opinion means ****. The boxing public has spoken, they had pac losing the fight. That's something pac has to live with :rofl