Has wlad done enough such that he's began a new universally accepted lineage?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by lufcrazy, Dec 2, 2011.


  1. Quick Cash

    Quick Cash Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,718
    352
    Jul 12, 2007
    Erdei himself vacated his WBO title, not the lineal crown, as far as I know.
     
  2. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    82,092
    22,178
    Sep 15, 2009
    Well now you know better :)
     
  3. The Mongoose

    The Mongoose I honor my bets banned

    24,478
    128
    Aug 13, 2009
    Ok, here's the deal on this.....

    The Ring didn't have actual titles in 1996, the magazine was just a ranking system at this time.

    They just recognized Hill as #1 for beating Maske.

    They didn't bring back the Chaimpion system and start issuing their own belts until 2002...by this time they had already put Jones as the #1 for beating Hill, Griffin, Harding and the like.

    I do think they should have made him and Michalczewski fight. But I don't think that system wasn't even in place yet, think they just issed the belts to number ones in select weight classes.
     
  4. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    82,092
    22,178
    Sep 15, 2009
    Yeah I know, if they're to have been true to themselves they'd have kept dm as number 1 until a point they could sanction him in a fight.

    Every other lineage ended up with a ring belt aside from dm.
     
  5. The Mongoose

    The Mongoose I honor my bets banned

    24,478
    128
    Aug 13, 2009
    In all fairness, Michalczewski did kind of become a non-factor in the division despite his linage while Jones cleaned out the top 3-5 guys.

    It kind of reminds of what they just did with Bute. He was the #1 just last year but they pushed him aside as Ward and Froch progressed to the final rounds of the Super 6.
     
  6. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    82,092
    22,178
    Sep 15, 2009
    Yeah and that's how I saw it too but the ring claim to follow lineage and in that instance they failed.
     
  7. Quick Cash

    Quick Cash Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,718
    352
    Jul 12, 2007
    Spoken with all the dismissive arrogance of someone who's utterly lost the plot. Produce a source so we can finally move on.

    The problem here is, you fail to consider that the WBO and lineal titles are two, separate things. You have your whole focus fixed on Erdei's vacation of one claim, yet in doing so, you turn your back on history. This isn't exactly unique in boxing. It wasn't 5 years ago, when Hatton gave up his own alphabet title to move up, but he retained recognition as the true light welterweight champion. The moment he moved back down, Pacquiao was waiting to take it from him. I assume you have Pacquiao as the former light welterweight king now, don't you?

    I challenge you to cite where Erdei actually said he vacated with no reference to the WBO, for starters. If you can't find the statement, you can't punch holes into my argument. Hatton, and many others, was given the benefit of the doubt, why not Erdei?
     
  8. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    82,092
    22,178
    Sep 15, 2009
    It is dismissive because if you can't recognise the primary source that is erdei himself then there's nothing I can do.

    There's a difference between being stripped and voluntarily vacating.

    I hope you have a merry christmas and a happy new year sir.
     
  9. Quick Cash

    Quick Cash Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,718
    352
    Jul 12, 2007
    Likewise, there is a difference between vacating the WBO championship and the lineal championship.

    Both happened to Hatton, actually. He was first stripped by the IBF for refusing to face their mandatory challenger (he fought Collazo next for a belt at welterweight, I believe). He then regained it by defeating Urango, but later vacated to battle Mayweather. Pacquaio won the lineal title from him in his very next fight.

    I wish the same to you and yours. Enjoy the holidays.
     
  10. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    82,092
    22,178
    Sep 15, 2009
    We're going round in circles. You believe he never intended to give up his lineal claim? Point to one interview where he stated his intention to retain his status as divisional champion.

    Show me any hint of intention by erdei to retain his status and i'll continue the debate.

    The difference with hatton is he stated his indecision about his future and specifically left his options open, helped especially by his non relinquishment of the ring title.

    Just two month or so ricky burns was ranked top two at sfw, he them vacated his title and announced a move up to campaign at lw, he has subsequently lost his ranking.
     
  11. Nay_Sayer

    Nay_Sayer On Rick James Status banned Full Member

    15,707
    503
    May 25, 2009
    Now you're shifting the goal posts - again.

    The burden of proof is on *you* to produce evidence to suggest that Erdie explicitly vacated his claim to the linear 175lb claim.

    All this talk about WBO belts and what not is one big Red Herring.
     
  12. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    82,092
    22,178
    Sep 15, 2009
    No the original claim is by erdei himself. If anyone is to refute his vacation they have the burden of proof since it is they who are claiming his vacation wasn't a vacation at all.
     
  13. Nay_Sayer

    Nay_Sayer On Rick James Status banned Full Member

    15,707
    503
    May 25, 2009
    Really?

    When did Erdei say *anything* about vacating his claim to the lineal 175lb title?
     
  14. The Mongoose

    The Mongoose I honor my bets banned

    24,478
    128
    Aug 13, 2009
    What does Yahoo's divisional rankings say?

    I would look myself but they only exist in your mind.
     
  15. Nay_Sayer

    Nay_Sayer On Rick James Status banned Full Member

    15,707
    503
    May 25, 2009
    Have you cooked up your daily crack dosage yet?