Marco Huck #3 rated Heayweight

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Ncc84, Dec 26, 2011.


  1. Ncc84

    Ncc84 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,709
    2
    Oct 14, 2009
    According to boxrec's points based system
     
  2. Overhill

    Overhill Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,960
    5
    Jul 28, 2010
    One of the few ****ers I want to see starched out.

    Perfect. :)
     
  3. Chappy112

    Chappy112 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,347
    10
    Nov 14, 2009
  4. pirao666

    pirao666 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,327
    2
    Jun 18, 2011
    Terrible, Povetkin will **** him.
     
  5. madballster

    madballster Loyal Member Full Member

    37,210
    6,767
    Jul 21, 2009
    I wouldn't even dare to rate Huck before seeing him against some random journeyman or at least some shot guy like Sam Peter or Hasim Rahman.

    Huck's a nobody and he knows it. He just comes to collect a paycheck at HW and then to disappear back to CW.
     
  6. damian38

    damian38 BigDramaShow Full Member

    25,548
    203
    Sep 11, 2011
    #3? are u ****ing kidding????
     
  7. Evian McGirt

    Evian McGirt Drink some water baby! Full Member

    438
    0
    Oct 11, 2011
    P4P #1 at ring entrances though.

    Those crazy "Germans". :lol:

    EDIT: Those Boxrec rankings get a little crazy, never put too much stock in them.
     
  8. The Spider

    The Spider Guest

    :deal
     
  9. Keueng

    Keueng Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,304
    1
    Jul 28, 2009
    Easy guys, the rankings are only computer generated, they have their flaws
     
  10. Ncc84

    Ncc84 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,709
    2
    Oct 14, 2009
    The boxrec system is usually a pretty good impartial system, where boxers are ranked by what they have done, not speculation about how good they are or will be.
    However, this is one of the flaws with the system, he is third based on his cruiserweight achievements, this works fine when someone is moving from featherweight to superfeatherweight, or middle to supermiddle etc but the step up in size from cw to hw is huge compared to the other weights
     
  11. He should be no higher than 17.
     
  12. Not so sure about that. The men Boxrec rate around him Povetkin, Adamek and Chambers are all more or less the same weight and size.

    **** all that for a minute now, I've just seen Boxrec have the awful Tyson Fury ranked 7th! Madness.
     
  13. Ncc84

    Ncc84 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,709
    2
    Oct 14, 2009
    A middleweight is only 8lbs lighter than the biggest smw and when someone steps up from middleweight to super middleweight they are the same weight, whereas most of the other heavyweight in the top 10 are much bigger than Huck. It is obviously the biggest step up in weight (or maybe LHW to CW).
    Tyson Fury is not the 7th best Hw but he deserves that rank based on the level of opponents he has beaten. I would favour Ustinov, mitchell, Pulev, wach, boytsov, price, Abdusalamov and gerber to beat Fury. But Fury has the better wins so should be ranked that high
     
  14. boxeo#1

    boxeo#1 Boxer-Puncher banned

    8,993
    1
    May 11, 2007
    Boxrec ratings are simple: You pay and you get points.
     
  15. boxeo#1

    boxeo#1 Boxer-Puncher banned

    8,993
    1
    May 11, 2007
    You shouldn't put any stock in them at all. It's ridiculous most of the time.