**jack dempsey lists the greatest fighters**

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by RockysSplitNose, Dec 25, 2011.


  1. RockysSplitNose

    RockysSplitNose Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,271
    62
    Jul 15, 2007

    One line in this garbage proves that the writer either doesn't know jack (haha excuse the pun) about Dempsey or has a total ignorance of circumstance - that's the line about Jack defending against "a past prime Billy Miske" :patsch:patsch haha what the heck this was a charity fight basically - a personal deal to help his ailing friend get as much money together - it was known by both that this was not a genuine fight in any reality this was simply a money getter for Billy's family - so this @$$hole writer is stating Jack Dempsey as taking an easy defence to pad his record/because he didn't want to take difficult fights!!!?? This guy shouldn't be aloud to have stuff like that put into print - total and utter ignorance of the actual reality of the situation - Dempsey up to the early 90's was applauded for this one - helping out a genuine friend when he really needed it but then the revisionist historians getv hold of things and twist it into "oh Jack Dempsey took an easy defence against a past prime opponent"!!?? The defence was the last thing on his mind!! :patsch give me strength!!
     
  2. burt bienstock

    burt bienstock Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,285
    400
    Jan 22, 2010
    Who the hell is Mark Hauser ?
    To prove his POINT he disregards reality. Too numerous to recite his bias against a man who he has NEVER seen,and cites Dempsey's FOUR round fights with a fat spoiler Willie Meehan who fought 4 rounders often. in a regular bout the rising Dempsey would have killed him. Then he brings up the Jess willard slaughter, when there were no neutral corner laws, and
    Dempsey did what he was ALLOWED to do, and in any other times Dempsey would have won by a tko after the 3rd knockdown, but Willard after 7 floorings was allowed to come out for the 2nd round. Then of course Mt. Hauser ,whoever he is, brings up the Tunney fights, to demean Dempsey's true abilities, KNOWING perfectly well, that Jack Dempsey after NOT fighting for THREE years, without ONE tune-up, without his longtime
    manager Jack Kearns, and a slow moving shell of his prime, lost to a razor sharp Gene Tunney. This was not the true Jack Dempsey, anymore then
    the Ali who was beaten by Leon Spinks, Larry Holmes,and Trevor Berbick,
    was the Ali of his prime...But of course the eminent and fair Mark Hauser
    knows this . Cheers V...
     
  3. burt bienstock

    burt bienstock Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,285
    400
    Jan 22, 2010
    Rocky your correct in saying this marc hauser " don't know Jack". He has his agenda to defame Dempsey by citing half-truths about Dempsey. He mentions Dempsey fighting Billy Miske in 1920, koing Miske in the 3rd round, after Miske beseeched Jack for a bout. But Hauser to enforce his agenda or from sheer ignorance fails to cite that after Dempsey kod Miske
    in 1920, Billy went on a streak, winning his next 19 bouts out of twenty, beating ,Bill Brennan, Jack Renault, Charley Weinert, koing Willie Meehan 1rd, koing Fred Fulton in 1 rd, etc. He had to be in remission during that time, as he was going great guns AFTER Dempsey kod him. But of course
    Mr. Hauser overlooks the evidence, to make his CASE...Cheers Rocky.
     
  4. Vanboxingfan

    Vanboxingfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,591
    255
    Feb 5, 2005

    My point was to show both sides of the equation, including one who ignores the views of those who saw Dempsey to show how uninformed an opinion can be when going down that path. With that in mind, I don't give Mark Hauser much credence as i'm still of the opinion that the 1950 AP poll is the starting point of any debate about where Dempsey belongs in terms of ATG heavyweights. To deviate from that on the basis of racism, or other criteria is simply nonsense, because it implies that Dempsey was his own manager and promoter. He like most boxers fought the guy who was put in front of him, that's all you can ask.

    In his prime he was something special, but all fighters, including Ali and Tyson loose something when they have extended layoffs while also aging and to judge them against their worst performances doesn't do justice to any fighter.
     
  5. RockysSplitNose

    RockysSplitNose Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,271
    62
    Jul 15, 2007
    Big shout out to Vanboxing - a voice of reason and reality
     
  6. manbearpig

    manbearpig A Scottish Noob Full Member

    3,255
    134
    Feb 6, 2009
    No.
     
  7. Conn

    Conn Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    1,577
    53
    Jun 16, 2011
    who does he say after Fitzsimmons but before Peter Jackson ?
     
  8. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,073
    48,241
    Mar 21, 2007
    There are an awful lot of people with "an agenda against Jack Dempsey" in this world chaps. Just saying, you boys are saying this a lot now. It actually sounds a little...paranoid?

    Thanks for the video, good listen.
     
  9. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,608
    27,280
    Feb 15, 2006
    You have to acknowledge that there is a considerable movement against Jack Dempsey on this forum at the moment.

    It is moved forward by an unholy aliance between those who sincerely question his credentials, and those who have a grudge against him.
     
  10. manbearpig

    manbearpig A Scottish Noob Full Member

    3,255
    134
    Feb 6, 2009
    He is rated far, far higher than his record and the evidence we have really allows by some. He is clearly judged to a different standard to most fighters. Inactive champion who defended against sub par opposition and was defeated by Butterbean.
     
  11. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,912
    46,721
    Feb 11, 2005
    This is something many critics conveniently forget, that Miske, though stricken with a chronic condition, had A LOT of gas left in the tank. Bright's disease, as it was known, comes in periods of inflammation attacks. Miske may have known his kidneys were shot, but it didn't mean he was constantly debilitated, just that sooner or later one of these attacks would be the last one and lead to his demise. I think it was Miske's last fight against Brennan that he was even eating and was considered too weak to get to the ring. He KO'd Brennan in 4 and was dead in 6 weeks. But that was over 3 years after Dempsey bout.
     
  12. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,608
    27,280
    Feb 15, 2006
    When exactly did this take place?
     
  13. manbearpig

    manbearpig A Scottish Noob Full Member

    3,255
    134
    Feb 6, 2009
    1918-1926
     
  14. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,073
    48,241
    Mar 21, 2007
    No, I wouldn't acknowledge that. I would say, at the very least, it's a chicken-egg scenario where it's hard for me to know if it's active or re-active.
     
  15. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,608
    27,280
    Feb 15, 2006
    If you can't post a thread about a fighter, that is in no way related to their strengths or weaknesses as a fighter, without it turning into a full blown attack on them, then I think it is fair to say that you have a lot of people out to get them.