Is Floyd easy to beat?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by brando, Dec 27, 2011.


  1. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007

    lol, you just quoted roach before when he said that mosley was too good. but now roach's word doesn't matter? :lol:

    you must be talking about mayweather sr. he blames his fighter when he lose just like hatton.
     
  2. acr347

    acr347 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,724
    1
    Jun 19, 2010
    2 fights I would've loved to see. I think Forrest would've beat him. Not sure about Winky.
     
  3. Hook!

    Hook! Proud member of team G. Full Member

    9,463
    1
    Jun 25, 2011
    pacman was just exposing them :rofl:rofl:rofl:patsch:patsch:patsch
     
  4. MichiganWarrior

    MichiganWarrior Still Slick! Still Black! Full Member

    26,793
    7
    Mar 20, 2010
    Mayweather beats Forrest. Loses to Winky. Forrest didnt look good against Quartey. Winky would have been tough though for Floyd. Bigger, almost as fast, great jab, great defense. How would Floyd open Winky up? Floyds not a volume puncher. Tough prospect for Floyd. Would favor Winky heavily.
     
  5. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    he also fought them coming from 12 months and 15 months of inactivity respectively. also both of them are GBP fighetrs which floyd loves to fight for the last 5 years.

    so which GBP fighter do you think floyd would fight next?
     
  6. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    24
    Oct 27, 2010
    That was definitely not Floyd's damn fault that Hatton wasn't ready enough at 140 and Mosley wanted to go fight Oscar instead of facing Mayweather
     
  7. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    it's a huge money fight against a part-time boxer. oscar was hardly a threat anymore.

    the pac fight showed how far mosley has regressed and floyd fought almost the same version just a year earlier. margo was his last great performance and that was 15 months before the floyd fight.
     
  8. Hook!

    Hook! Proud member of team G. Full Member

    9,463
    1
    Jun 25, 2011
    you are ignoring the fact that team pacman ducked mosely until floyd dominated him.

    if oscar was so **** why drain him?
     
  9. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    24
    Oct 27, 2010
    Oscar was 34 coming off a one year layoff.

    Floyd vs Ortiz was 34 and a few months older coming off a 15 month layoff :hi:
     
  10. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    i will school you on this matter since it's clear that you are just going on what the other *****s are saying.

    1. pac-cotto was the fight to be made since it was clear that pac was ringside the cotto-clottey fight and he would fight the winner. also cotto was with top rank so it's basically cotto has the inside track in the fight and the only thing that would prevent this is if he backed out.

    2. pacquiao has just 1 fight at 135. dela hoya picked pacquiao as a replacement since he is targetting a rematch against floyd at 147 since floyd won't agree to fight oscar again at 154. so basically oscar was preparing for a floyd fight and not pacquiao at 147. when floyd retired instead, oscar cherry-picked a 130/135 pacquiao and made him move-up two divisions. so do you think it's proper if oscar made pacquiao move up 3 divisions? pac never drained oscar, it was oscar and his conditioning coach's fault for making oscar weigh too low with a month still to go thinking they need to be faster against pac since they already have the size advantage.

    i hope you learned well... :tong :D
     
  11. Hook!

    Hook! Proud member of team G. Full Member

    9,463
    1
    Jun 25, 2011
    you are very very stupid :rofl

    Cotto was only made because Shane would not go down to 142-143 ROACH ADMITTED IT! ROACH! DAMMIT! :lol:

    Even if Pacs team did not try to drain oscar he was still drained, watch that video seriously.
     
  12. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    floyd never looked as bad before like oscar was with sturm. :yep

    and oscar has been with a lot of great opponents in the past and has been in a fair share of wars. floyd had a few great opponent in the past and was seldom involved in a war. bad analogy and comparison.
     
  13. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    a sign of someone being owned badly is to curse and call names.

    mosley was desperate for a big fight. he was asking for a pacquiao fight but he knew well that pac is fighting cotto. i have explained this to you when pac was seen watching the cotto-clottey fight in MSG. do you even know this or are you still locked-up in your moms basement at the time?

    oscar drained himself. so are you seriously suggesting that pac should have fought oscar at 154 when he had just one fight at 135? :lol:
     
  14. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    24
    Oct 27, 2010
    yeah you right. Floyd has been boxing since he was a toddler and still has the same intensity he has at 34. When I watched the Ortiz fight, Floyd still showed the great reflexes, blinding speed, amazing foot speed and upper body movement from 130.

    This fight was from 2006 and it looks just like Floyd does now

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hECeVAIXYBs[/ame]
     
  15. Hook!

    Hook! Proud member of team G. Full Member

    9,463
    1
    Jun 25, 2011
    dude seriously, roach said it, not me, roach, cotto happened because of shane not happening.

    i am not blaming pac, i am just saying that he was drained, once again watch that video, roach will tell you.