If Bute isn't worthy of a shot at Ward, how is Dre Dirrell worthy of a shot at Bute?

Anf if YOU judge it for Direll then it's a Direll win ? you need to call boxrec right now to tell them

 

Froch outlanded Dirrell. Read the punch stats. If Dirrell had od done more he could of won, but Dirrell didnt do enough

 

Obviously a Slappy Joe nuthugger doesn't see the value in fighting real competition.

 

Anyone who knows how to score a fight (clean, effective punching winning rounds) gave that fight to Dirrell. People invented their own criteria to justify the Froch decision, saying Dirrell deserved to be punished for being negative :nut

 

Punch stats are a load of shite. Compubox had Pac outlanding Marquez. Do you think Pac won that fight?

 

AA is not harder to dominate than Andrade. A lot of people argue that Bute also has the talent to be A level.

For the better part of rounds 7-8, Johnson gave Froch all he could handle. Couldn't touch Bute with his right hand.

Dirrell I reckon is #3 on Interbox's list. Ward, Froch, Dirrell. Hopkins is still with HBO apparently, and Kessler not avail until Aug/Sep.

I certainly wouldn't mind Bute-Dirrell if the S6 finalists both decline a Bute fight. Thing is, Bute-Dirrell shouldn't be a 'qualifyer' for Bute nor Dirrell. They both deserve a shot at Ward's belts; the only thing is that Bute draws big money, has a belt and has KO power. Dirrell has none of that.

 

it count for 0 how i've seen the score.The only thing that matters is how Massimo Barrovecchio and Daniel Van de Wiele saw 115-112.you should speak with MichiganWarrior about this fight,he even made a video "the robbery in Notthingham" or something.fact is Froch has an W and Dirrell has an L on their records.

 

:rofl You probably haven't even watched the fight. That's also an incredibly stupid way of looking at it. Just because some crooked judges give a bull**** decision, it doesn't mean that fighter won the fight. It's a W on Boxrec but to those capable of independent analysis (that doesn't include you) it's a points win for Dirrell.

 

You make a good point about AA; we differ on Johnson, but not by much.

Bute very well may have the talent to be A level. I call him "unknown" or "untested," not "hypejob" or "fraud" like a lot of posters.

I think Dirrell will show a little more pop as he gets more comfortable on the bigger stages. He was sitting on his shots pretty well against AA. Time will tell. With both fighters.

 

If Brian Magee was worthy then I don't see any issues with Dirrell.

 

I don't see any issue either, for all I care Dirrell deserves a shot at the S6 champ. I'm using Ward's logic. :thumbsup

 

If Bute beats Froch, Dirrell or Kessler next. Ward has absolutely no excuse not to fight him. He'd be clear number 2 after a win against one of those three.

 

you are barking of the wrong tree.You want to see how i scored the last 2 rounds don't you?i don't give a crap about your "independent analysis" cause you are not the one who matters.I think you are one of those idiots who think Khan lost his fight and Dirrell won his,the black guy always win right?Dirrell made a fool out of himself that night,you don't go in a foreign country and fight to take the home town hero his title by runing.Check the judgees scorecards,you'll find only 3 rounds scored the same,Dirrell ruined that fight...so i guess you could score it however you like...but facts are facts and moronic opinions are **** !

 

What utter drivel! Black guy always wins? You mong!

Boxing is boxing no matter where you go. You shouldn't have to do that bit more in order to get a win away from home. You land cleaner more effective punches, you win the round. It's that simple. That is exactly the deluded rationisations I'm talking about.

 

Are you claiming ****ing Elvis is biased towards black fighters. :rofl


Dirrell rocked Froch and made him stumble. Got ****ing jobbed son. 18 fight prospect. Never been twelve rounds. And you people needed to rob him. Accept it.