who do you consider as the winner of jmm vs pac trilogy

When asked to pick an un-official winner in a seemingly dead even series of fights... saying it was a draw is a cop-out. Might as well just ignore the thread if thats how yer gonna answer.

I know how to score a fight. I know how many points are deducted for a knockdown.

I'm not ****ing talking about points. If I was talking about points the series is a draw. I told you I considered the knockdowns a tiny factor. Tiny, yet decisive... in one man's very un-official (yet somehow controversial?) opinion.

I'm now exhausted from repeating myself... gonna go find a Klitschko thread. :hi:

 

I would accept this as well. Just another reason to declare the whole mother****er a draw.

 

If you have the trilogy a draw, you have it a draw for a reason...you can't just give Pacquiao extra points for the knockdowns (on top of the points he has gained for the knockdowns). For example, I'm not going to give the edge to a boxer in a drawn bout for say being more exciting. :conf

Oh well, we're not going to agree.

 

I'm not giving anyone any points. It's not about points.

In a schoolyard fight between 2 eighth graders. The crowd of students afterward would pick an un-official winner based on the amount of blood and how many times each kid was down. They aren't busting out score-cards and ****. Thats the angle im coming from.

Can too! :bart

 

Cool, so all drawn bouts should be decided by the crowd from now on. You should take your idea to the commissions :good

 

second fight i gave to jmm by a single point

third fight jmm won 8-4 IMO

i have watched but not scored the first one, can't find any good whole fight part 1 , 2 , 3, 4 etc on youtube, help please :bbb

 

Bro you keep getting my opinion mixed up with the official scoring. I'm not debating the official scoring, nor is there an official way to determine the winner of this trilogy. So my opinion is formed purely by "outside the box," un-official means. You are really taking it too seriously...

And still, I'll stand by my perfectly reasonable opinion on this. :smooch

 

Nah, I'm not taking it too seriously...don't see how you could pick up on that over the internet really.

On the one hand, you know how to score a bout.

On the other hand, you use your unofficial scoring to decide the ultimate winner.

Makes sense. :good

 

I will say this:

I have clearly stated my opinion and backed it up with significant points. I haven't even gone so far as to claim anyone else's opinon was wrong... Because they are opinions. :yikes

Just sayin.

 

Everyone on this forum is entitled to their opinion, that doesn't mean that someone else can't disagree with them. Where would the debates be? If I have disagreed with one of your opinion's, I have backed it up with relevant points. I haven't just turned around and insulted you like some posters would do. :good

 

I think it's called "Agree to disagree."

I think you and I could fistbump and enjoy a fight and a beer despite having slightly differing opinions on this trivial issue.

Also... GO **** YOURSELF

jk

 

:good

 

Juice and Anthony what a great debate . . . lol!

the trilogy was even but if I was forced to pick I would have to say Pac

 

First fight: pac

Second fight: pac

Third fight: jmm