Calzaghe on ESPN: 'Would have taken Ward out with ease'

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by colinthfc, Dec 29, 2011.


  1. colinthfc

    colinthfc Guest

    Calzaghe takes swipe at Froch
    ESPN staff
    December 29, 2011« Spain turn to Sanchez-Vicario | I'd welcome Carroll back - Pardew »

    This content is protected

    Carl Froch was beaten on points by Andre Ward earlier this month © PA PhotosEnlarge




    Related Links




    Super-middleweight legend Joe Calzaghe has continued his long-running war of words with Carl Froch by claiming he would have taken care of Andre Ward with ease.
    Froch lost his WBC title to Ward in the final of the Super Six tournament earlier this month, suffering a unanimous points defeat in Atlantic City. Afterwards Froch admitted that the Olympic gold medallist had been far too good for him on the night.
    The Brit's loose defence was ruthlessly exposed by Ward, who regularly took advantage of his opponent's low hands to sting him with a series of hooks.
    But despite that defeat, Froch is still expected to face IBF champion Lucian Bute in his next bout - and, when last questioned on the subject, he was not giving up hope of coaxing Calzaghe out of retirement for a 2012 clash. Calzaghe hung up his gloves undefeated in 2009, having beaten Bernard Hopkins and Roy Jones Jnr in his final two fights.
    However, as was the case when he was active, Calzaghe continues to show no interest in facing Froch - although he could not resist a subtle swipe when discussing Ward."I think the way Ward fights would have suited me to be honest. I would have had too much speed and power for him. So, yes, I would have beaten him, but congratulations to him and his team. I hope he goes on to have a great career," Calzaghe said to hattonboxing.com.
     
  2. skel1983

    skel1983 Guest

    Colin you been on the Whizz today mate? This is high even for your standards.
     
  3. achillesthegreat

    achillesthegreat FORTUNE FAVOURS THE BRAVE Full Member

    37,070
    29
    Jul 21, 2004
    What a BS pumped up article, if you can even call it that.

    He said what he thought he'd do to Ward but he hardly takes a swipe at Froch.
     
  4. spud1

    spud1 HAWK TIME!!!! Full Member

    10,667
    3
    May 8, 2010
    Why doesn't he come out of retirement and fight Andre, if not he should shut the **** up plain and simple.

    No good saying you would have done this or that when he still has the ability to actually do.

    Edit: saying that joe is probably about 39 now but that isn't the point.
     
  5. colinthfc

    colinthfc Guest

    Off to the pub in a few minutes and therefore will be clocking off until the morning.

    Sorry folks no new threads until tomorrow
     
  6. Leif Erikson

    Leif Erikson Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,560
    115
    Oct 3, 2004
  7. insider

    insider Journeyman Opponent Full Member

    446
    0
    Jul 9, 2011
    Calzaghe was special. Ward could be but if Calzaghe of 2005-2008 was innthe Super 6 you,d have to strongly back him. There,s no point in Carl or anyone else calling him out now though. He'd be a shot fighter. I think even Joe knew that after the Jones Jr fight.
     
  8. madpuppy

    madpuppy Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,165
    6
    May 15, 2011
    Calzaghe is a what-if P4P number 1 of all time. He had his chance to prove his greatness, but he stayed at home for far too long. A couple of more big wins (Bute, Dawson etc.) and Ward would already be ahead of Calzaghe.
     
  9. slip&counter

    slip&counter Gimme some X's and O's Full Member

    24,813
    20
    Jul 23, 2008
    Calzaghe would've decisioned Ward, imo. But what did people expect him to say? It was hardly outlandish or controversial comments. Move on. :thumbsup
     
  10. glue glove

    glue glove Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,517
    3
    Jun 9, 2010
    Getting knocked down by old men who were several years past their best instead of fighting guys which would have cemented his legacy......

    Calzaghe is on of the 'what ifs....' in my opinion.
     
  11. Briggs

    Briggs Member Full Member

    142
    0
    May 2, 2009
    Calzaghe only narrowly beat Kessler, Ward dominated him. Froch narrowly lost to him.

    That is the best indication that we have of how these three stack up head-to-head. As for resumes, Ward's already surpasses Calzaghe's.

    I see Calzaghe as a bit of an over-achiever if anything. He ended up with a pretty good resume, and the best names: Kessler, Hopkins and Eubank, are all guys that he was clearly at the limit of his talents in beating (albeit I scored the Hopkins fight for Hopkins, on the basis that I don't give credit for blocked or ineffective punches). If he had been able to fight Andre Ward, or if he had fought a prime Jones Jr, I'm confident that he would have lost; as it is, he carries the prestige of an "0" and therefore his fans maintain strange beliefs about him being an underachiever.

    Edit: Of course Ward's resume doesn't actually surpass Zaggy's yet. I meant to say that Ward's resume is already not too far behind Zaggy's, and he has plenty of years left in the tank - so Ward wins in a comparison of resumes as it stands.
     
  12. dftaylor

    dftaylor Writer, fanatic Full Member

    20,730
    1
    May 7, 2010
    :lol:
     
  13. Earl-hickey

    Earl-hickey Boxing Junkie banned

    14,011
    3
    Oct 31, 2010
    Joe would beat Ward, he doesnt need to fight him to prove that, its a simple fact
     
  14. mike464

    mike464 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,846
    0
    Sep 10, 2005
    Calzaghe wouldn't even fight Ward.
     
  15. toffeejack

    toffeejack Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,064
    1
    Apr 30, 2007
    Oooh look, Mike464 climbs out of the woodwork when there's a Calzaghe thread. What a surprise. :lol:

    Ward was a nobody when Calzaghe was around FFS :patsch. And yes, he most likely would have beaten him.

    Regarding the article, he isn't slagging Froch at all.